True Science Debunks Darwin's Macroevolution Myth

[ThisisnotChad]

Originally Posted by samwise

Ok, let's check this cat out...

Google "Alter2Ego"

This chick is one twisted individual.
Reminds me of IamSam

lol

She's on a guitar forum..... LOLOLOL


http://www.agileguitarforum.com/show....php?tid=19271

"Alter2Ego...

Do you even own a guitar? Have you posted one thing about a guitar?

This is primarily a guitar forum. Take your 100% religious shit somewhere else you fuckin' whackjob."

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU ALTEREGOOOOOOOOOO !!!!! ALTEREGOAWAY

Quit trolling the internet and go find something to do. You troll guitar forums ?????

[Alter2Ego]

PART 1 of 3

ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

No fossils have ever been found showing ANY species or type of animal evolving into an entirely different species or type of animal.

When pro-evolution scientists claim they have evidence evolution occurred, they're referring to "microevolution," which isn't evolution at all. It's simply adaptation of the animal to its environment. In other words, the animal didn't evolve into something else. It's simply a variation of the exact same animal. Therefore the change is considered "below the species level." Anything below the species level is just a variation of its parents and can therefore produce offspring (can interbreed) with other variations of itself.

DEFINITION OF "MICROEVOLUTION":
"Evolutionary change below the species level; change in the genetic makeup of a population from generation to generation." (SOURCE: Biology, 7th ed. Neil A. Campbell & Jane B. Reece)


DEFINITION OF "SPECIES":
"Loosely speaking, a species is a related group of organisms that share a more or less distinctive form and are capable of interbreeding. As defined by Ernst Mayr, species are:

"groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups."
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Species

~***~

[dad61]

Originally Posted by Alter2Ego

PART 1 of 3

ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

No fossils have ever been found showing ANY species or type of animal evolving into an entirely different species or type of animal.

When pro-evolution scientists claim they have evidence evolution occurred, they're referring to "microevolution," which isn't evolution at all. It's simply adaptation of the animal to its environment. In other words, the animal didn't evolve into something else. It's simply a variation of the exact same animal. Therefore the change is considered "below the species level." Anything below the species level is just a variation of its parents and can therefore produce offspring (can interbreed) with other variations of itself.

DEFINITION OF "MICROEVOLUTION":
"Evolutionary change below the species level; change in the genetic makeup of a population from generation to generation." (SOURCE: Biology, 7th ed. Neil A. Campbell & Jane B. Reece)


DEFINITION OF "SPECIES":
"Loosely speaking, a species is a related group of organisms that share a more or less distinctive form and are capable of interbreeding. As defined by Ernst Mayr, species are:

"groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups."
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Species

~***~

[Alter2Ego]

PART 2 of 3

ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
We see examples of "microevolution" in different breeds of dog, in variations of horse, in variations of domestic house cat, etc. Since dogs are variations of wolf, all breeds of dog can produce offspring with all other breeds of dogs, including with wolves. Similarly, since horse and zebra belong to the family Equidae, they can interbreed. The slight differences in the physical appearance of creatures that are within the same species is irrelevant because the differences are "below the species level." Therefore the creature can interbreed with other breeds within the same species. Dog breeders can breed different variations of dog from now until kingdom come and they will always wind up with dogs. The same can be said of other species of creatures.

The point is that the term "microevolution" is a trick-phrase used by pro-evolution scientists to mislead the gullible: to have people thinking it is possible for creatures to evolve into something other than what they started off as.

The argument I hear often by those who don't have a clue is that: "microevolution indicates the creature can keep evolving until it changes into something entirely different" (macroevolution). In other words, the gullible are under the delusion that microevolution can lead to macroevolution. It cannot, because "microevolution" is a fabricated term that is meant to mislead, and macroevolution is a myth for which there is no evidence.


"MICROEVOLUTION":
Pro-evolution scientists look at a creature's ability to adapt to environmental pressures and refer to it as "microevolution." The animal didn't evolve. It adapted, because God created it with the ability to adapt up to a certain point. Once the adaptation limit is reached, the animal dies if it can no longer cope with environmental pressures. That's how animals become extinct.

If animals had the ability to "micro-evolve" until they changed into something entirely different, no animals would have gone extinct. Animals going extinct is proof that once they reach the limit of their inborn ability to adapt, they simply disappear as a species forever. Extinction, in and of itself, debunks the evolution lie.


I will expand on microevolution later in this thread, but will shelve it for now. In Part 3 of this presentation, I will not be elaborating on "microevolution." Instead, in Part 3, I will address the "macroevolution" fallacy.

[Alter2Ego]

PART 3 of 3

ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
God created animals to produce variations of themselves. The result is that animals of a certain species will adjust to their environment by, for example, producing more fur in colder climates. The creature didn't "evolve." It simply adapted to its environment by means of it's inborn genetic makeup, which has a set limit. Once the creature reaches its limit and cannot adapt to environmental changes, it dies rather than change into an entirely different creature.


The term "macroevolution" refers to any species or type of animal evolving into an entirely different species or type of animal. The resulting creature can no longer interbreed (produce fertile offspring) with the creatures it started off as. Examples of this is a squirrel evolving into a bat or a whale evolving into a bear, which are actual Charles Darwin claims that have since been debunked.

There is no evidence in the fossils--the bones of long-dead animals--showing macroevolution ever occurred. It's simply a theory that has now reached the level of myth. So to mislead the gullible, pro-evolution scientists look at similarities in bones and claim the similarities are of animals at different stages of evolving into something else. Ask them to find bones that connect one set of fossils to another (the missing link) and they will start lamenting about gaps in the fossils record.

"Gaps in the fossils" equates to "there are no bones connecting one creature of a particular species to a creature of an entirely different species." It matters not that the creatures look similar. The fact remains there are no bones connecting them to one another.


Anything ABOVE the species level belongs to a different species and cannot interbreed with anything besides creatures of its own species.


DEFINITION OF "MACROEVOLUTION":
"Evolutionary changes that happen over very long periods of time. This usually refers to the development of large new branches of life, such as vertebrates or mammals." (SOURCE: Evolution: The History of Life on Earth, Russ Hodge)


Notice how slick the pro-evolution scientists are. In the above definition of "macroevolution," they claim that this occurs over "very long time periods" or "over geologic time" aka millions of years. In other words, they have no way of proving macroevolution since no human has lived "over geologic time."

Where macroevolution is concerned, what it boils down to is blind faith: believing something occurred while having no means of proving it. These are the same people who laugh at Christians for believing in God because they claim there is no proof of the existence of God (a fallacy, as there is ample proof for the existence of God, as indicated in my Precision in Nature thread). Below is the weblink that will get you to that thread.
http://forums.liveleak.com/showthread.php?t=97700

[samwise]

Originally Posted by ThisisnotChad

lol

She's on a guitar forum..... LOLOLOL


http://www.agileguitarforum.com/show....php?tid=19271

"Alter2Ego...

Do you even own a guitar? Have you posted one thing about a guitar?

This is primarily a guitar forum. Take your 100% religious shit somewhere else you fuckin' whackjob."

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU ALTEREGOOOOOOOOOO !!!!! ALTEREGOAWAY

Quit trolling the internet and go find something to do. You troll guitar forums ?????

Boxing forums, body building forums, the list is endless.

https://www.google.com/search?q=True...-a&channel=rcs

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...2529391&page=4


It's one thing to become a member here and participate in the forums but to sign up and actually spam this section is off to say the least.

Especially when it is obvious that she is doing this across the entire Internet.

[ThisisnotChad]

Originally Posted by samwise

Boxing forums, body building forums, the list is endless.

https://www.google.com/search?q=True...-a&channel=rcs

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...2529391&page=4


It's one thing to become a member here and participate in the forums but to sign up and actually spam this section is off to say the least.

Especially when it is obvious that she is doing this across the entire Internet.

I've never seen anything like this LOL !!!

What a fucking LOSER. She's on "blackplanet" as well.


Alteregoaway, what do you get out of doing this shit. Is this a mission from god that you have to annoy everyone on the internet ?

I'm gonna start going to those other forums and telling them the same shit about her. What a lunatic.

[YWAHW]

I have faith in evolution, not so much in internet spammers. Spammers are like door to door salesmen, always selling shit with a big grin.

[figatova]

Originally Posted by YWAHW

I have faith in evolution, not so much in internet spammers. Spammers are like door to door salesmen, always selling shit with a big grin.

Evolution doesn't require faith, just a basic level of schooling.

[UKatheist]

one slight query,

what is true science?