Iraqis cannot forget what Americans have done here’

[moefugger]

I was sent over there when Saddam attacked Kuwait.
That is why I was there.

[KittySpit]

Originally Posted by Yorkie

Then don't go to war.







Illegally

"Legal War" is an oxymoron.

[KittySpit]

We spent American money and lives to get rid of a modern day monster, who was not afraid to kill his own country men en mass, and effect regime change in a country known to be belligerent to us and it's neighbors.

Let history judge us, not the LiveLeak forums.

[Blackhawk067]

Originally Posted by smeblee

Is this the guy who said he was in fallujah, go called out, and it turned out he meant he saw vids of it.??

lol...no. We do love him though. He is most entertaining.

[ERiC_DrAyViN]

While I agree it is inconsistent of Iraqis to be angry at America and yet say nothing about Saddam or British involvement, let's not play games here. America never goes to war to "Liberate" another country as a charity run. America is not a charity and you did not go to Iraq to help Iraqis. That's just ridiculous!

Politicians, bankers, corporate businessmen, lobbyists etc... do NOT start wars to help people. In my view they went to get rid of Saddam because in November 2000 he changed currency of payment for his oil from Dollars to Euros. this would mean these greedy corporate businessmen/oil billionaires in America and elsewhere would lose a lot of profit.

But this idea that any Country starts a war because its Government wants to help another Country's people is just pathetic.

[Dat1111]

Originally Posted by smeblee

Is this the guy who said he was in fallujah, go called out, and it turned out he meant he saw vids of it.??

Lmao probably.. So many liars regarding this conflict its ridiculous.. Of course there are gonna be people opposed to the coalition otherwise there wouldnt of been a war.

Regime loyalists, alqaeda, insurgents, jihadists, etc.. Under saddam if you complained about.

It royally sucks there was no easy answer and I dont know anywhere that there is such a thing in this countries..

[KantiKotal]

Originally Posted by ERiC_DrAyViN

While I agree it is inconsistent of Iraqis to be angry at America and yet say nothing about Saddam or British involvement, let's not play games here. America never goes to war to "Liberate" another country as a charity run. America is not a charity and you did not go to Iraq to help Iraqis. That's just ridiculous!

Politicians, bankers, corporate businessmen, lobbyists etc... do NOT start wars to help people. In my view they went to get rid of Saddam because in November 2000 he changed currency of payment for his oil from Dollars to Euros. this would mean these greedy corporate businessmen/oil billionaires in America and elsewhere would lose a lot of profit.

But this idea that any Country starts a war because its Government wants to help another Country's people is just pathetic.

Exactly, It's always been that way, every nation have done the same thing, only morons will believe that coutries go to war to liberate another country for charity.

[avisegev1]

Originally Posted by KittySpit

We spent American money and lives to get rid of a modern day monster, who was not afraid to kill his own country men en mass, and effect regime change in a country known to be belligerent to us and it's neighbors.

Let history judge us, not the LiveLeak forums.

GWB and Obama aren't much different, they'll still kill americans they disagreed with.

[neuvostoliitto]

Most Americans have forgot that Saddam was best friend of US in 80's. And that US supplied Saddam with various chemical weapons, same weapons that were used as excuse for invasion.

[ericredbeard]

Originally Posted by avisegev1

GWB and Obama aren't much different, they'll still kill americans they disagreed with.

They'll kill treasonous Americans plotting to attack the US and its citizens. Give me a drone and I'll kill them myself, unless you can get me within 400 yards of them, in which case a rifle will do just fine. You talk as though our Presidents authorize killing of Al Qaeda supporters because of some academic "disagreement". That's like describing the USA and Japan having a "disagreement" beginning Dec. 7th, 1941. Get fucking real.