Liveleak Forums  

Go Back   Liveleak Forums > Special Interest Forums > All Special Interest Topics > Political thought / philosophy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2014, 11:01 PM   #201
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Indeed.Darwin and Religion need not be "incompatible"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private-Parts View Post
“Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.”

Attachment 132744
Indeed. The debate is false. Darwin and Religion need not be "incompatible".
It really just depends upon the "religion" in question. For an example there
is the re-emergence of the National Alliance as both an important political
and religious phenomenon that, agree or disagree, really needs to be fully-
documented and that their ADV, agree or disagree, sometimes reveals the
facts that the corporate mass media and powers-that-be would "certainly"
and most really prefer be kept hidden. Their "religion" is Cosmotheism. It is
a religion that embraces both evolution and darwinism.

http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewforum.php?f=59

American Dissident Voices broadcast of December 28, 2013
Listen to the broadcast here: http://nationalvanguard.org/2013/12/...oices-renewal/

Renewal and Rebirth



by Kevin Alfred Strom

TWENTY-TWO YEARS ago today this radio program, American Dissident Voices, was born. Today, it is reborn. From 1991 to 2006, Dr. William Pierce and I were heard in offices, at camps in the woods, in automobiles, at kitchen tables or on bedside radios, crackling through the airwaves via faraway AM and shortwave stations or in the perfect fidelity of the Internet. (ILLUSTRATION: The new National Alliance headquarters and media production center under construction today.)

With our call to racial loyalty we were, perhaps, shocking millions — but certainly awakening thousands. Many of those American Dissident Voices broadcasts are still being heard today. Our message? The paramount importance of the survival and progress of our race — upon which everything depends and without which nothing matters; the fundamental biological, evolutionary, and racial nature of human life and of society; the true nature and identity of our enemies; and the application of these truths to every challenge facing us as a people.

By telling the truth — without sugar coating — about the dire plight of our race, and its potential for future greatness almost beyond imagining, we awakened uncounted souls from the depths of catatonic consumerism; from empty, childish religion; from phony, raceless conservatism; from deadly, anti-racial liberalism. I still receive letters from those whose lives I touched. And those we reached helped us reach more and more of our people and build the National Alliance, the most promising and most uncompromising organization for White people ever to exist on American soil.

And we made some powerful enemies. To keep us off 50,000-Watt shortwave station WRNO, organized Jewish groups boycotted the station and withdrew their advertising from it and its FM sister station — but Joe Costello, the station’s owner, believed in free speech and kept us on the air even though it cost him a huge amount of money. Then they “outed” Joe Costello as a so-called “racist,” and published in their newspapers that he had given money to — horror of horrors — David Duke’s political campaigns, trying in yet another way to ruin him financially. But Joe Costello would not bow down. American Dissident Voices stayed on WRNO — for many years.

Also defiant was the ownership and management of clear channel KXEL, an AM station that covered half of the United States and Canada at night. Pressure was applied to them again and again for months, but the station’s owners would not capitulate — and our voice was still heard. The controlled media published editorials denouncing American Dissident Voices and KXEL in both countries, and Jewish groups even tried to get the Canadian government and the Washington regime’s FCC involved. But the only thing that finally worked for them was for the enemies of free speech to out-and-out buy the station and then refuse to sell time to us, and that process took a very long time. In the meantime, twenty states and five provinces got a weekly 50,000-Watt clear channel dose of truth.

Less inspiring — but still edifying — was the case of the Delano, California FM station that carried our show for a while. After a few weeks, though, the general manager of the station notified us that we were being cancelled because, although he agreed with many of our positions, our failure to venerate God’s Chosen Race was “unscriptural” and a sin of such magnitude that it could never be forgiven, much less tolerated.

Then there was the curious case of the two millionaire brothers who owned a powerful Los Angeles radio station and who put American Dissident Voices on the air for a month or so. The brothers personally called Dr. Pierce on the telephone after a few shows had aired, apologizing profusely and admitting that they knew that everything we were saying about race and the organized Jewish groups was true, but that if they continued to air the show they’d have zero advertising revenue — and Black rioters burning down the station (and possibly the brothers’ homes) in very short order.

When the Internet came into almost everyone’s home in the mid-1990s, American Dissident Voices was there — with a bigger audience than ever and almost no way to shut us down. But the Enemies of Life play dirty and they do not play by the rules, even their own.

For example, it’s not yet illegal for a racially conscious White man to run for governor or president, so David Duke was brought down — for a time — by other, quasi-legal means. And it’s not yet illegal for a racially conscious White man to broadcast and publish articles and radio shows that reach hundreds of thousands of people, with ratings that exceed those of some large establishment media outlets, so I too was brought down — for a time — by other, quasi-legal means as well. The regime has used the same techniques of perjured testimony and corrupt law enforcement against countless good people and truth-tellers in an effort to prevent the revolution from coming.

When the unworthy and the merely ambitious inherited the National Alliance name after Dr. Pierce’s death, I kept American Dissident Voices alive and independent until the System falsely charged and imprisoned me and stole every material thing I had on this Earth. ADV as produced by the post-Pierce “National Alliance” became moribund. Its inheritors did not understand what they had inherited. Listenership dwindled and the broadcasts ended. Recently even the National Alliance, no longer uncompromising and a shell of its former self, was effectively disbanded.

Some have called for reforming the existing shell of the Alliance by an appeal to its board of directors, but that effort was doomed from the start. I doubt that a single member received even the courtesy of a reply to their heartfelt calls for change.

This situation is intolerable.

On this, the twenty-second anniversary of the first American Dissident Voices broadcast, a group of those who worked closely with William Pierce over many decades is gathering together to do something about it. Not only are we re-starting ADV, we are re-forming the National Alliance and building a headquarters and media center in a new redoubt in Dr. Pierce’s beloved Appalachian mountains.

The National Alliance’s long-time Membership Coordinator, former Green Beret Will Williams will manage the new Alliance; I will direct its media. Both we and others who will be assisting us behind the scenes worked directly with Dr. Pierce, some of us on a daily basis, for decades.

It is time to be uncompromising again. Those who took the Alliance in a “big tent” direction, hoping for quantity at the expense of quality, have all failed — miserably. Excising the parts of Dr. Pierce’s Membership Handbook that pointed out fundamental contradictions between Christian doctrine and the National Alliance worldview did not bring numbers to our ranks nor advancement to our cause. The original Membership Handbook, the one actually written and approved of by Dr. Pierce, will be our starting point. The Cosmotheist understanding of the purpose of the Universe and the meaning of our lives, undergirded by reason and science, will be the basis of all our efforts.

None of this is to say that the new National Alliance will be a movement mired in the past, crystallized forever by whatever William Pierce’s last utterance may have been on any topic. No. The world is changing, ever evolving, and so must our strategy and tactics also evolve. Even — and I hesitate to say this, but it is true — even the details of our understanding of our mission and our place in the Universe may evolve as new facts come to light. But, like William Pierce himself, we who stood beside him, we who understand what he understood, we, as the only adults in a world of children, have the responsibility to educate and guide our people toward the light, toward ascending the Upward Path once again.

We must never lose that vision. We must not base what we say and do on gaining popularity at the expense of our long-term goals and fundamental principles. There will come a time for single-issue front groups, for cooperation with other nationalists to achieve certain limited goals, for a modus vivendi with other races and nations, but never at the expense of the goal of White living space, never at the expense of pretending to believe what we know isn’t true, never at the expense of allowing other, opposed, ideologies a place within the National Alliance leadership.

It will be objected that we are but a handful of men, and that is true. But I was there when all the men and women who had promised to help Dr. Pierce build a new community had abandoned him, and membership was at an all-time low. One by one, Will Williams came, Fred Streed came, I came, Joe Pryce of Dresden fame came, and others of sterling character and generous hearts and inspired souls came to the mountain — and we made something great grow in those Appalachian hills, something that, whatever comes, will never be forgotten. Great movements of national renewal always begin with a few trusted men, gathering together to pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to a cause that is greater than themselves, to a future that requires devotion — and action — to come into existence.

It will be objected that my reputation has been sullied beyond repair by the System’s lies and no one will listen to my words. But the reputations of the Heroes of the Twentieth Century, whether they were Europeans forced to fight for their lives against the regime in Washington, or Americans who tried to stop the slaughter and build a secure, confident, triumphant White America, have had their reputations cast into the mud as well — yet history will vindicate them all. Rightly heard, their stories are inspiring stories of men battling an unworthy enemy who cannot stand the light of day and who ruins lives with transparent, desperate lies when he fears his crimes are about to be exposed.

Our new National Alliance will be the living embodiment of William Pierce’s vision, based on his moral and religious principles and carried forward by the those who gave up almost every material thing to make that vision a reality. Will Williams has been building the new offices and media center and, in the text version of this broadcast, I’ll show you a picture of its current progress. I have set up a studio for producing this radio program again. Together we have started an online community called White Biocentrism for those who are interested in educating themselves and their families.


Photograph of upstairs studio area and editing suite. (Apologies for clutter of construction materials.)

White Biocentrism may be found at whitebiocentrism.com and we welcome supporters there who are willing and able to help us build a community of strength and unity, based on the racial and philosophical principles embodied in Dr. Pierce’s work. White Biocentrism is not a “free speech” forum, however — it is not a place where agitators and nay-sayers may come to disrupt our growth and waste our time. It is a place strictly for genuine, authentic, serious, and decent White men and women to join us, grow in understanding, and help us expand our efforts and influence so that our people may survive the dark times ahead.

I invite you who are hearing my words today, as we enter a new year of new possibilities, if you are serious about building a new nation and a new civilization; if you have severed every shred of your loyalty from the monster on the Potomac, if you believe as we do that the future is what we make it; if you believe that we are personally responsible for the nation our children and grandchildren and their great-grandchildren will inherit — and for the racial quality of those future generations; if you believe with us that no multi-racial society can be a truly healthy society; if you believe that the first step in building our new nation is to raise the consciousness of others; I invite you to join us in this, not only the greatest undertaking of our lives, but of all the centuries our people have lived on this planet. Join us as we fulfill in reality the words which Dr. Pierce placed on the masthead of National Vanguard magazine: Toward a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People.

* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free — free men are not equal — and equal men are not free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:54 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 05:13 PM   #202
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default

American Dissident Voices broadcast of January 4, 2014

What is Right and What is Wrong

by Kevin Alfred Strom



EACH OF US has only a few years to live. At our conception, we awaken from a sleep that has lasted for millions of centuries. We walk this Earth for a few paltry years. We are nurtured by parents and family. We receive love. If we prove strong enough, we give love. If we do right, we find a mate, overcome whatever obstacles there may be, and leave descendants to carry on when we are gone. And we are gone soon enough — a handful of decades if we are lucky, and that is all. Then we sleep again, for billions of years, perhaps for infinity — except for that part of us that lives on in our descendants and in our kin.

And in that brief moment of waking life, bounded on both sides by what Raymond Chandler called “the big sleep,” we are faced with choices, many choices. What should we do with this, our moment on Earth? What should we avoid doing? What behavior, as social beings, should we reward? What behavior should we punish? These are questions of morality, of what is right and what is wrong.

What is morality?

Over the ages, men have answered these questions in many different ways. Before the dawn of language and organized society, we had our instincts. We wanted to live; we wanted our family and our offspring and our kin to live; we wanted our tribe, our people, to live. We knew these things were right; we didn’t have to analyze them or think about them — or justify them. We knew they were right, deep within our race-soul.

When our poets and theologians and priests told us of the gods, and when our warriors and philosophers and lawmakers began to organize our societies, imperfect as they were and imperfect as they have always been, the structures and the narratives they built were based upon the instincts and urges within our own race-soul — and they were compatible with our continued existence and upward progress.

We had enemies, of course, who wanted to take our lives and our means of living away from us — but we knew, also instinctively, how to deal with them: Since we are here now, we know our ancestors made sure that there was little more left of our foes than bloodstains in the snow.

We didn’t have to face then the sly enemy we face today — the enemy who assaults us armed, not with a broadsword and shield, but with brilliantly-conceived propaganda, with clever questions and fictions designed to make us doubt our values, doubt the traditions our ancestors built, and doubt our very right to exist.

Even when a large part of our race abandoned its traditional religions and philosophies and embraced an imported faith from the Middle East, the new belief system was profoundly changed by its collision with the European race-soul, and — in some senses, though not all — it became ours. It became Europeanized. For centuries, our people thrived and progressed and fought off incursions of other races under the banner of Christianity. But along with the benefit of a kind of spiritual European unity — “Christendom” — came the danger of being tied to the Middle East, and therefore to Jews and to Jewry’s wars with their other Semitic spiritual offspring, Islam.

The ostensible morality of the enemy

Today, the Jewish power structure, with its control of money-creation, its virtual ownership of Western governments, and its dominance of the mass media of news and entertainment, has, through a crude system of punishment and rewards, caused us to accept a false value system, an inverted morality. They have emasculated the Church, encouraged its worst tendencies and stifled its best, and, with tiny exceptions, made of it a gigantic engine of racial mixing and of importation of non-Europeans into our living space. Partly because of this intimidation and partly due to deep confusion on the part of its leaders, the Church today demands that believers never think of themselves as Europeans, or identify as Whites, but instead embrace a “universal” identity of all who “believe” — including, of course, members of every race, who must be welcomed into the marriage bed as much as into the pews.

And all modern Westerners, inside and outside the Church, are schooled from their earliest years and in every mass medium in the new race-denying and White-race-destroying “morality.”

The true morality of the enemy

From the promotion of racial mixing to a warped “feminism” that pits White men and women against each other and turns them away from their natural roles; from a debt-money banking system that enslaves students and young people before they can even get a start in life — and effectively delays or prevents them from becoming parents — to the enabling of massive Third World immigration into White countries and only into White countries; to the promotion of every kind of perverted, unnatural sex imaginable; the enemy and his collaborators are operating under a twisted moral code that is seldom spoken out loud, but which amounts to this: Whatever prevents White children from coming into the world is good; whatever causes more White children to come into the world is evil.

And the Jewish power structure and its collaborators know better than anyone that throwing off their morality of death is essential if we are to survive. And our survival is apparently something they’re not willing to tolerate. So they have worked ceaselessly to criminalize those who would work to oppose their sick, inverted values.

But oppose them we must, or we are done for. We must build a new spirituality, a new morality, a new societal structure that will secure the existence of our people and put us on the upward evolutionary path once again. Despite any blockades they put in our path — despite any personal sacrifices it might entail — it is our duty to bring that new spirituality, that new morality, that new nation into existence.

Breaking free

So what is the best way to do that? What strategy has a chance of imparting a better, healthier morality to a fraction of our people — a fraction large enough and of high enough quality to survive in the face of an extremely determined and powerful Opponent? Should we promote a return to paganism, the Classical religion and the philosophies it engendered, or the Nordic religion of our ancestors? Should we fight for a return to the conservative Christianity of 120 years ago, when the Church seemed a bulwark against subversion and racial dissolution — and, if so, what sect’s beliefs should prevail? Or should we embrace nihilistic atheism, individualism, and hedonism, and argue to our people that getting rich, partying, fornicating, and indulging themselves in every possible way would be more pleasant without Blacks and Mexicans all over the place?

The last mentioned strategy might get lots of recruits, but it doesn’t stand a chance of success. The philosophy of atomistic individualism works against group survival. Those who adopt it are, whether they know it or not, working for the extinction of their group. And, right now, the money and status perks are all controlled by our enemies, and no individualist or hedonist in his right mind is going to sacrifice to support a nascent White nation.

The old-line traditional Christian approach is being tried by some noble, racially conscious Whites. It has the advantage of having a moral basis that is familiar and comfortable to many. It has a great and inspiring history, too. For centuries the identities “White” and “Christian” were almost synonymous. But it has the disadvantage that many of the highest quality men and women of our race find its mythology unbelievable. It is true that some sects have attempted to de-Judaize and racialize the religion, but have met with little success. Almost all Christian sects regard the Jewish scriptures of the Old Testament just as much the word of God as the more recent, and also heavily Jewish, covenant of the New. Thus the religion ties us to the Middle East and to the idea that our primary Opponent is especially holy, with a few sects all but worshipping him. And much in Christian scripture is openly anti-racial and universalist. A nationalist clergy, like that in some of the nominally Orthodox eastern European nations, may ignore those scriptures or interpret them away for now — but what about a century from now? It would probably be beyond the powers of even a Patriarch or Pope to excise them from holy writ. And Christianity, as dominant and all-powerful as it once was, has one other major fault: Like the U.S. constitution, it was utterly unable to prevent our present plight.

A return to European paganism or neo-paganism is appealing in many respects, even though, as with Christianity, many of our best minds cannot literally believe in its gods and myths. One can still, however, be a rationalist — as were many pre-Christian philosophers — and nevertheless honor Demeter or Zeus or Odin or Freya as aspects of our own souls and evocations of the archetypes permeating our racial memories. As these faiths are tribal faiths, racial faiths really, it can plausibly be inferred from them that we ought to survive. And there are innumerable gems of wisdom and healthy morality to be found in their stories, precepts, and lessons. But the body of European pagan works is somewhat amorphous, is not systematic or unified, and is ill-suited to serve as a guide to action today. It is good that racialism is in its background, supremely good compared to the others. But in our times, as we face racial annihilation, we need a faith which places racialism in the foreground.

No second chances

If we are to replace the morality of death offered us by the System with a better morality, we must choose carefully. No White nation remains uninvaded. Whites are already a minority in American maternity wards. Muhammad is the most popular baby name in London. Our time is limited. Our resources are few. Prior generations of White leaders betrayed us, and the levers of power and money in the West are no longer in our hands. We must choose a strategy carefully, as we most likely will not have a second chance.

We must awaken a new generation of our people. We must inspire the superior minds among them. We cannot do that by reviving the distant past of our race, no matter how much we can and do honor it. We cannot do that by ignoring the exponential increase in human knowledge that has been brought about in the last century — knowledge of the genetic structure that makes us what we are, and knowledge of the structure of reality itself.

None of the strategies I have enumerated so far seems likely to revolutionize the moral thinking of the superior fraction of our population — the fraction that can actually get things done and change this filthy excuse for a society into something great and noble again.

But there is another choice.

It’s a strategy that brings a new idea into play. An idea that can inspire our best men to great deeds of courage. An idea that can give meaning and spirit to all our lives. An idea that has been gradually coming into being for 2,500 years but one which we have only been able to see clearly for a little over a century. It is an idea in harmony with the American founders’ vision of an all-White nation — and the in the racial visions of pre-World War 2 America — and in the European revolutions which came before their time in the early 20th century. It is the idea which was immanent in the discoveries of Charles Darwin and in his revolutionary books on the evolution of what he called favored races in the struggle for survival. It is the idea which became explicit in the words of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra and Shaw’s Don Juan. It is the idea that was first made manifest as morality by William Pierce in his Cosmotheism.

Cosmotheism accepts the reality of the divine, of God, but it also accepts the undeniable evidence of science. It has no truck with supposedly ancient and “inerrant” holy books — but instead asserts that physics, mathematics, and genetics are the real words of God. Cosmotheism tells us that living things, including ourselves, are part of an ever-evolving whole. Cosmotheism teaches that this whole — that the universe itself — is becoming conscious, and that our race is in the vanguard of that evolution. Cosmotheism also shows us that racial divergence and separation are integral, essential parts of this evolutionary process and that life as we know it could not exist without them.

Cosmotheism is an idea that can build a whole new world for us, a world in which our survival is a given, a world filled with infinite possibilities for our advancement.

We who are awake to our race’s great peril and even greater potential have a responsibility to our children and our children’s children and to all the generations to come. As the philosopher William Gayley Simpson told us, it is our duty “to hang stars over a people, and to lift up their eyes thereunto; to set high lands before them, and to lay out a path by which they may climb thither.”

Cosmotheism is our best hope. It is an idea which can lift up our people’s vision from the filth to the stars, and show them the higher ground to which we can ascend.

That is the mission of Cosmotheism. That is the mission of the National Alliance. That is the mission of this radio program.

In future programs, I’ll be telling you more about the Cosmotheist idea. Please join me next week on American Dissident Voices.

* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.
---

Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/01/...what-is-wrong/

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:55 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2014, 09:09 AM   #203
Odin's Fist
Liveleaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1
Odin's Fist On the road to addiction
Default

Good luck with that, most of the world has moved beyond being afraid of those who are different. Hope you can "sort" things out for your self, otherwise you're going to be pretty miserable.
Odin's Fist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:28 AM   #204
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default An Evolutionary Morality


American Dissident Voices: An Evolutionary Morality

Published on January 11th, 2014


Charles Darwin. His discovery of biological
evolution has profound moral implications.


by Kevin Alfred Strom

TO CREATE AND PROPAGATE a true and unshakable moral basis for the survival of our race is the most fundamental task of the National Alliance.

If we were to, say, elect a few pro-White politicians or repeal a few anti-White laws — as difficult as those propositions would be these days — but we just continued along with establishment Liberal morality or establishment Conservative morality, or the morality of the major churches — we would have no real, lasting effect. All our efforts would, in a few decades or years, be gone with the wind. Eventually, some temporary situation or persuasive politician would reverse all that we had done.

All our work would be for nothing because the values and morals of our people are the wrong ones. If our standard of morality is “happiness,” or “what would Jesus do,” or “the greatest good for the greatest number,” or “liberty,” then there is really no reason for the White race to survive. We might as well pass from the face of the Earth.

The morality accepted by our people today is fractured, confused, vague, and artificial. It is our task to replace it with true morality. And true morality is now, and always has been, the morality of group survival.

Morality was born, in a sense, the instant that the first self-replicating molecule came into existence. From that moment forward, some actions of the new living beings would lead to increase and further evolution, other acts (they weren’t choices yet, therefore the “in a sense”) to decrease and possibly extinction. With the rise of consciousness, a more complex morality was born, involving real moral choices though still strongly guided by instinct. As our imaginations — and the priestly class — elaborated human morality, our way was sometimes lost. Something besides our survival was elevated to the highest value.

As the writer David Sims tells us, “Morally speaking, a flaw is anything that works contrary to survival. In any proper moral system, survival has the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value at all to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. If a moral system gives to anything but survival the highest place of value, sooner or later a conflict will arise between survival and whatever that other thing is.”

If you want to be an agent to restore true morality to our people, you must understand certain things. The first is the evolutionary nature of life.

Life is ever-evolving, ever-changing.

Evolution is real. Evolution is not only real, it is a fundamental, necessary, aspect of life — in fact, without evolution, living things as we know them could not exist.

And racial divergence and separation are themselves essential parts of evolution. Without racial separation, therefore, there could be no life at all. Does this sound like an extreme conclusion, unwarranted by the evidence? Is it contrary to science and to the morals held by all good people? Or is it a simple truth, the realization of which can change the minds and hearts of our people, and put them on the right path once again? Let’s find out.

Evolution is real
“Without racial separation there could be no life at all.”

To understand that idea, we must first understand that evolution is real. It’s astounding that a century and a half after Darwin, this is still controversial. So much nonsense is written on the subject that I think the best way to approach it is from an entirely new angle. As I wrote earlier last year:

A creationist might not acknowledge that he is related to a chimp, but he probably would admit that he is related to his own mother. “After all,” he might say, “obviously I share 50 per cent. of my genes with her.”

But that estimate is wildly off the mark. Actually, he shares more than 99.9 per cent. of his genes with her — because, in addition to the obvious one-half direct ancestry, he shares almost all of his ancestry with her in common, because both his parents share almost identical common ancestry too. Go back a few dozen centuries, and they’re practically all the same people.

Common ancestry is the only rational explanation, and it is the full explanation, for the near-total agreement between the gene-patterns of father, mother, and child.

Common ancestry is also the only reasonable explanation for the astonishingly high degree of genetic similarity between humans and other mammals.

The genetic similarity of a man and a mouse, for example, is about 92 per cent.

It is as if you had a hypothetical 100-volume set of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, with each volume consisting of 1,000 pages of very small type on onionskin paper, 100,000 pages in all — and then compared it to another, unknown, encyclopedia, and discovered that its first 92,000 pages were absolutely identical to those in the Britannica (to say nothing of the fact that the remaining 8,000 pages had a lot of similarities too).

Could that be a random coincidence? Could the two encyclopedias have just by some sort of luck, or by the very nature of encyclopedia-writing, turned out to be that similar? I don’t think so. It should be obvious to anyone not inebriated by Maury Povich, Benny Hinn, or Jack Daniels that one was derived from the other — or that both were derived from a common source.

Mice and men share so many — almost all, in fact — of our genes because we share many, many common ancestors.

Common genes equals common ancestors. That doesn’t mean we evolved from mice. But it does mean that both mice and men evolved from a common ancestor, not so long ago in the scale of geologic time. Close enough in time to make our gene-patterns 92 per cent. identical.

The percentage of genes we share with other species is a measure of how many common ancestors we share with them — and that itself is a measure of how long ago we diverged from them.

Bearing that relationship in mind, consider that we share 44 per cent. of our genes in common with fruit flies — 26 per cent. with yeast — and almost 20 per cent. in common with a grain of wheat.

That is proof — as absolute as it is possible to get in this imperfect world — that there was a time, long long ago, when our ancestors, and wheat’s ancestors, were the same species.

For even in a case where “only” the first twenty volumes of the encyclopedia — 20,000 pages — were word-for-word identical with our Britannica, who would be so foolish as to say they had no common source?

So evolution is real. Genetic similarity proves we have common ancestors with our fellow Earth creatures. Life is what it is because it evolved. But there’s more. We have to ask the question –

What is life?
Without racial separation there could be no life at all. Before we can validate that statement we need to go one step further.

The science writer Don Kaiser came up with the concept that life is evolution. No further definition is necessary. He said (emphasis mine):
The sole characteristic that ultimately distinguishes living from non-living matter is classical Darwinian evolution. Life is simply matter that evolves.
A simple analysis of the definition of life leads to the conclusion that living matter is inanimate matter that evolves. Evolution is the sole feature that differentiates living matter from non-living matter.

Consider a definition of life from the old college days:
Life is the property of a highly organized molecular complex, the stability of which is maintained by its constant utilization of energy.

It seems a bit flowery, so to simplify:
Life is organized matter self-maintained by energy utilization….

Energy utilization is essential to maintain the stability of life forms because, without it, life forms are very unstable and decompose into non-living matter. In fact, life forms are so unstable that, even with energy utilization, they all eventually die….
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:29 AM   #205
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Does the Definition Exclude All Non-Living Matter?

But wait –

Does the Definition Exclude All Non-Living Matter?
There are many examples of non-living matter maintained by their utilization of energy. Some examples are waterfalls, volcanoes, hurricanes, and stars. So, a definition of life requires something more to exclude such non-living matter. Adding something about reproduction might help:

Life is organized matter self-maintained by energy utilization and a process that reproduces its structure for self-maintained energy utilization in the future….

By specifying that life must include a reproductive process, inanimate matter like waterfalls and hurricanes are excluded. However, some scientists might argue rather convincingly that stars reproduce. To eliminate stars as living matter, a process that more faithfully reproduces itself could be added:

Life is organized matter self-maintained by energy utilization and a process that accurately reproduces its structure for self-maintained energy utilization in the future.

This simple definition seems to eliminate stars and other forms of inanimate matter….

Perfect Clones Can’t Cut It.
Any life form with a reproductive process that creates an exact copy or a perfect clone of itself would satisfy the requirement of a process that accurately reproduces itself. Such a process would always produce the same exact structure and function for energy utilization and self-maintenance in a given environment. However, in a changed environment, functional energy utilization and self-maintenance might benefit from, or even require, new structure(s).

Every Environment Changes With Time.
In order for a life form to persist through time, it must have a mechanism that provides for structural changes to function in a changed environment. Some life forms can produce exact copies or perfect clones, but most importantly, they also provide mechanisms for introducing structural changes by mutation or recombination. No life forms exist that cannot provide such changes. So, the definition of life becomes:

Life is organized matter self-maintained by energy utilization and a process that accurately reproduces its general organizational structure with a mechanism that allows for structural changes to utilize energy for self-maintenance in a changed environment.

Based on this definition of life, the sole characteristic that distinguishes living from non-living matter is a reproductive mechanism that allows for structural changes to utilize energy for self-maintenance in a changed environment.

Adaptation is Essential.
When successful structural changes to utilize energy for self-maintenance in a changed environment are produced, adaptation is said to occur. Over time, with continuously changing environments and adaptations, life forms undergo natural selection and classical Darwinian evolution. Thus, for periods of time exceeding the lifespans of individuals, the sole characteristic that distinguishes living and non-living matter is the process of Darwinian evolution. So, what is life?

Life is matter that evolves.

Most fundamentally, the definition becomes:
Life is evolution.

The two are inseparable. Given the fact that all life forms die, how do they persist through time and changing environments? Every environment harboring life forms must change, simply because of their existence, so evolution is the only way life forms can persist through time. Not only did Charles Darwin discover what makes life possible despite the fact that all life forms eventually die, he unwittingly discovered the sole feature that distinguishes living from non-living matter. Charles Darwin defined life.
Life is Evolution.
* * *
So, armed with this definition — that life is evolution — what can we conclude about my earlier claim? — Without racial separation there could be no life at all.

We have common ancestry with every living creature on this planet, if you go back far enough. So the old racialist idea of “purity” — meaning an unbroken, nearly identical lineage going “back to Adam” — was wrong from the start. Purity is the wrong word; those who used it were unaware of the ever-evolving nature of life. They were ignorant of evolution, which is a branching process; they didn’t know that all the races, varieties, subspecies, and species that ever lived are branches on one metaphorical tree — and that, going backwards in time, all the branches eventually converge into one at the root.

But at the opposite end from the root, going forward in time, they are diverging — branching apart. And the only way that new species can be born is by first going through a process of racial separation. This racial separation can be temporal, spacial, or psychological — or some combination of the three — but it must occur for evolution to happen.
All living things have gone through this process of racial separation, countless times, and they are still undergoing it. It is a natural tendency of all life. And it is ludicrous to assert that human beings are somehow exempt from it.

So racial divergence and separation are not only facts, they are also essential to the evolutionary process. Life as we know it could never have come into being without them. Now my statement should make sense to you — now you should be able to see its truth in all its simplicity and clarity: Without racial separation there could be no life at all.

All living things evolve into races, which are divided by appearance, structure, and behavior. This applies to apples and anchovies, wheat grass and wallabies, manatees and men.

This branching process is simply what life does: It evolves. It forms races. Those races separate and evolve further. Some go extinct and some become new species. This is happening — continually — to all living things.

Life could not exist without this process. One might even go so far as to say that life is this process.

Since racial separation is essential to life, I believe it is proper to say that, if anything is sacred, racial separation is sacred.

* * *
A racially mixed — part Black and part White — actor from Britain, Dudley O’Shaugnessy, recently posted this statement about racial mixing online:
“If we weren’t meant to mix, whoever put us in this earth, if we weren’t meant to mix… we would be on different planets. But we are not, we are on the same planet.”

I think O’Shaugnessy’s statement, incoherent as it is, is pretty typical of what young people are being taught today.

But what he said is the opposite of the truth. Golden eagles and fish eagles and bald eagles are all on the same planet. Were they “meant to mix”? Preposterous. They can, but they practically never do in Nature. And, if they did on any large scale, it would mean the end of these unique creatures.

Evolution, as I said, is a branching process, and, once the divergence reaches a certain point, the branches don’t recombine. Forcing them to recombine — as is being done to the European peoples today through propaganda and social policy — is unnatural, anti-life, anti-evolution, and it is also genocide.

There was a time, a million or more years ago, when a certain tribe of proto-humans became separate and ceased to mate with the sub-humans around them. Had they not done that, we would not be here today.

Nature is always forming new subspecies. They are always branching, separating, becoming new species. This is as true for grass and gazelles as it is for humans. This is natural and necessary and good. To oppose it by advocating racial mixing is the ultimate in human folly, and egotistic hubris against Nature.

* * *
So this is the core of our Cosmotheist spirituality.

The evolution of life has led to the evolution of consciousness. We are the consciousness of the Universe coming into being. The upward evolution of this consciousness, so far as our present understanding allows us to know, is our purpose. And this upward evolution can only happen through a process of racial divergence and separation.

Our spirituality is in harmony with the discipline and the discoveries of science. Our spirituality is — unlike virtually ever other faith — not only compatible with our race’s survival, but, properly viewed, it regards our survival and upward evolution as imperatives.

Armed with this understanding and this faith, we can and will change the world.
* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

For proper formatting and to listen to the broadcast, go here: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/01/...nary-morality/
__________________

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:56 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:32 AM   #206
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Loyalty, part 1

American Dissident Voices: Loyalty, part 1
January 18th, 2014



Listen to the broadcast here: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/01/...oyalty-part-1/

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is dead. The money-men, the media moguls, and the crooked politicians they employ, have killed her. Ring no bells, for she died long ago while we were sleeping. But understand this: the foul regime that misrules us from Somalia-on-the-Potomac has no loyalty to you or your family. It does not represent you or your best interests. It regards you as a slave, fit only to work for your betters or die in their endless wars; as a fool, if you believe their sugared lies about “democracy” — and as an enemy if you don’t. Since it has no loyalty to us, it is high time we withdrew our loyalty from it.

What I prefer to call the regime in Washington has abandoned any shred of loyalty to our people, and openly serves its Jewish masters. The regime regards the perceptive, intelligent fraction of the American people as its enemies and it works ceaselessly to weaken, destroy, and replace us. It does not trust us and has us all under what amounts to house arrest and total surveillance. Some perceptive Americans, many of them brilliant higher-ups within the regime itself, men like Edward Snowden, the insider who broke the NSA spying scandal, have begun to realize that the regime regards its own people more as dangerous adversaries than as citizens.

The great inversion

The regime’s legal system has produced so many laws, most of them illegal and unconstitutional themselves, that no one person could even read them in a single lifetime — yet you’d better believe that even the most obscure of these laws can and will be used against you by a federal prosecutor if you annoy the money-men or their FBI / NSA /CIA employees too effectively. But Jewish bankers can openly steal billions upon billions of dollars from the people, as happened in the recent real estate bubble and the brazen “bank bailout” ripoff, and no one ever, ever goes to jail for that.

America’s mulatto pop-star “president” openly brags that he’s “good at killing people” after running on a “peace” platform, and brazenly asserts his right to maintain a “kill list” that includes American citizens. He sends drone missiles into apartment complexes halfway around the world in places where we’re not even at war, and orders countless new drones to be built to deal with us — that is, just to spy on us… for now at least. When Israel declares that Iran must be attacked to stop it from establishing a nuclear program, Barack Obama immediately starts reading from the Tel Aviv teleprompter, as do more than half the yes-men in Congress, from both parties — and the only thing that stopped the regime from starting yet another murderous war for Israel was the timely intervention of Vladimir Putin.

It’s a strange world we live in, especially for someone like me who grew up during the Cold War, a world in which I find myself very glad indeed that Russia never gave up control of those nuclear weapons that I used to be so afraid of as a child. Without that ultimate bargaining chip being always silently on the table, and without — for all its faults — a relatively sane, nationalist, and powerful Russia standing up to the Zionist fanatics who control Washington, Iran would almost certainly have become another killing field by now, more befuddled American soldiers would be dying for an ignoble cause, and all Americans would be in even more imminent danger of dying from the just retribution that is surely coming our way.

A strange inversion of roles has taken place, with America as the new Evil Empire: invading multiple nations that never did us any harm, establishing a huge military presence overseas, murdering innocents and enraging entire populations against us, and now spying on our own people on a scale that would have made East Germany’s infamous Stasi secret policemen blush. And opposed to the Evil Empire, and doing what it can to shield American dissidents like Edward Snowden, stands a transformed Russia.

Who is Snowden?

Now I don’t think Edward Snowden has a clue about nationalism or about Jewish power — after all, he offered up his secrets to a Jewish reporter — but he saw as only an insider could how the Washington regime routinely violates its own laws and how it massively violates the formerly sacred privacy rights of the American people. And so he had the courage to risk his own freedom — and possibly his life — to tell that story and prove it with incontrovertible documents. It’s ironic that the regime has charged Edward Snowden with espionage. “Espionage” is defined as turning over information to the enemy. Edward Snowden turned over information to the American people. We the people are apparently now classed by the “Justice Department” as dangerous enemies of the Washington regime. If only that assessment were entirely true!

And Mr. Snowden is not just some maladjusted anti-social rebel. He has the most impeccable Establishment credentials. His father was a Coast Guard officer; his mother is clerk of a Federal Court. He worked for both the CIA and the NSA, with the former agency providing him with diplomatic cover for his technical work. The NSA granted him a top secret Sensitive Compartmented Information clearance. One of his colleagues at the NSA said there were many people of high intelligence working there, but that Snowden was “a genius among geniuses.” He was “given full administrator privileges, with virtually unlimited access to NSA data” because, the colleague said, he could “do things nobody else could.” Snowden was actually, therefore, one of the regime’s top spies. And this man came to understand that the regime he served was no longer loyal to its own people, and therefore no longer deserved loyalty from us.

Ray McGovern

We’ve all heard of Edward Snowden, but how many of us know about Ray McGovern? Ray McGovern is a retired CIA analyst who worked at that agency from 1963 to 1990, and during the 80s was the man who prepared the President’s daily intelligence briefings. When he retired, he was awarded the Intelligence Commendation Medal — but he returned it in 2006 to protest and to draw attention to the CIA’s illegal use of torture. McGovern has also spoken out against the phony “intelligence” which was used to justify the invasion of Iraq.

And Ray McGovern has had the courage to expose the near-absolute control of Washington by the Israeli lobby. As he explained the motivations behind the Iraq War to a television reporter, “I’ve been using the acronym O.I.L. for …years now: O for oil; I for Israel; and L for logistics, logistics being the permanent — now we say ‘enduring’ — military bases that the US wants to keep in Iraq.”

McGovern says the US went to war in Iraq “for oil, Israel and military bases craved by administration ‘neocons‘ so the United States and Israel could dominate that part of the world. …Israel should not be considered an ally and [in starting the Iraq War] Bush was doing the bidding of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.”

McGovern went even further, adding “Israel is not allowed to be brought up in polite conversation. Genuine criticism of official Israeli policy is often portrayed as if it were anti-Semite bigotry: The last time I did this, the previous director of Central Intelligence called me anti-Semitic.”

So Ray McGovern is another man, also at a very high level in the US establishment, who understands that that establishment is working for alien — and not American — interests. Since the regime shows no loyalty to us, McGovern withdrew his loyalty from it.

William Binney

Consider the life of yet another man who saw the light, William Binney. Binney, a mathematician, had a long and distinguished career in the American intelligence establishment, beginning with the Army Security Agency in 1965, moving to the NSA in 1970 and rising from analyst to Technical Director, then to Geopolitical World Technical Director and finally Technical Leader for Intelligence. He resigned from the agency in late 2001 and stated that the NSA’s spying on American citizens — happening even then — was illegal and a purposeful violation of the US Constitution. Binney also revealed that the agency’s “collect it all” data policy, violating the privacy rights of millions of Americans, was of long standing even in 2001. He is pursuing a lawsuit aimed at ending this illegal surveillance. For his pains, he was the subject of an FBI raid in which twelve armed thugs invaded his home and pointed rifles at him, just as he emerged from the shower, while other “agents” seized his computer, discs, and paper records. Though he was never charged with any crime, he was terrorized, his privacy was violated, his business was severely disrupted — and after five years the items had still not been returned.

Now it’s our turn

All of these Americans — Binney, McGovern, Snowden — made a decision to withdraw their loyalty from the regime that is destroying us, taking away our freedom and self-determination, and treating us like enemies. Each of these men knew that it wouldn’t be easy when he took, each in his own way, the path of defiance. And all three worked at a high level in the intelligence field, putting them in the position of knowing for a fact just exactly how rotten the American establishment really is.

We racially conscious White Americans may not have had the same direct experience of the Washington regime from the inside as did these three men. But we have a higher understanding of the forces which control that regime. We know that the Jewish power structure has captured our media and our government, and we know that the consequence of following the policies they have forced on us — not only just unlimited support for the state of Israel and its wars, but our current policies of open borders, multiculturalism, and “racial equality,” guarantee the extinction of our race, of our kind, from the face of the Earth.

And we know that the regime’s “democratic” political system is specifically designed to keep the current oligarchs in power. We know that the Jewish-led “feminist” movement’s mobilization of White women as opponents of — and haters of — White men has divided the White vote to the point of impotence. And we know that the importation of Third World laborers and voters has made a ballot box solution impossible.

Even more than these intelligence experts, we racially conscious Whites know that the regime in Washington is killing us. We have seen it twist the law and suborn perjury to imprison innocent White Americans who stood up and spoke the truth. We know that no election or series of elections, and no educational campaign can turn the murderous Washington regime from that purpose. We know that either the regime in Washington is going to die — or we are. So we have an even greater reason to withdraw our loyalty from the federal monster than did Snowden, McGovern, and Binney. But are we doing it?

What we should do

Many of the racially-aware come from a conservative background. But the time for conservatism is now long past. The conservatives’ blind worship of the regime’s military borders on psychopathology. They have a fantasy, although many of them well know how evil the Washington regime is, that somehow that regime’s military is still ‘good’ and still ‘fighting for our freedom.’ How wrong they are! That kind of doublethink needs to stop right now.

Give none of your loyalty to the enemies of your people. That means giving no loyalty whatsoever to the murderous regime in Washington. Virtually all of its laws and all of its acts are flagrantly illegal according to our forefathers’ constitution anyway — the constitution that the regime pretends it still follows but does not. If you swore an oath to defend the Constitution, you are bound by honor to oppose, thwart, arrest, disobey, and disrupt by whatever means necessary the commands, edicts, orders, and pretended statutes of the vile thing that squats on the shores of the bloody Potomac, excretes Bills and Acts, and sheds the blood of the innocent.

The oligarchs’ regime in Washington is now irredeemably evil. All decent people should stop working for it — stop fighting in its military — stop inventing things for it — stop supporting it in any way whatsoever. And, if you cannot sever your connection with it immediately, throw sand in its gears, throw a monkey wrench in its evil works if you can, and be a whistleblower whenever possible. Destroy evil.

If you cannot do those things now and the ever-declining economy of Third World America dictates you must continue to be employed by the monster, then stealthily educate your fellow workers so they will stand beside you when the time comes that you can open the gates for the revolutionaries, and fail to execute our enemies’ orders at the crucial moment. Begin to prepare your family to survive without a System check, and then rejoice in the joy and freedom it will bring as you eat food from your own garden, warm yourself with wood from your own patch of forest as our ancestors did, and work for the day when that System’s leaders will be on trial for treason and all its checks will amount to nothing more than a good-sized bonfire.

Regard the regime’s 50-star rag not as our symbol but as the symbol of an occupying power. Teach your children to do the same.

Don’t waste a microsecond of your life trying to “reform” things and make life more tolerable under the current System. Work for a day when life under the System is so intolerable that building a new nation for our people becomes the only conceivable option. Give all your loyalty to the new nation in the making that is the reborn National Alliance. Rekindle the spirit of resistance among our people. Work for the day when the map of North America will be redrawn — by us — and there will be living space for our people once again.

* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:56 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:36 AM   #207
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Loyalty, part 2

American Dissident Voices: Loyalty, part 2
Broadcast of January 25, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom
Listen to the broadcast here: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/01/...oyalty-part-2/


White living space — there is no substitute

ONE OF THE WAYS that the Jews and multiracialists got South Africans to surrender their independence and freedom — and abandon their Apartheid system of racial separation — was through sports. Because so many otherwise sane South Africans were fiercely loyal to their cricket, rugby, soccer, and other teams, and because much of the world was boycotting South African teams so they could not compete on a worldwide basis, the Jews had the sports-minded South Africans in a classic carrot-and-stick situation. The Jews and their Gentile collaborators were saying in essence, “Abolish Apartheid and allow the races to mix freely in your country, and we’ll let your team play in the World Cup competition like it used to do. Keep Apartheid, and fail to vote in the new constitution, and we’ll make the boycott even stronger. You’ll be totally isolated.”

The boycott of their sports teams was a major issue in the South African press for years, and it loomed large in the minds of those White South Africans who pulled the lever and basically gave away their country and their children’s future by voting for one-party Black rule under Nelson Mandela.

Another, and even more significant, way that White South Africans were persuaded to sign away their self-determination was through their church. The dominant church among the Afrikaners, who form the majority of White South Africans, is the Dutch Reformed Church. The Afrikaners are a pious people, and much of their identity is and was wrapped up in their church, the doctrines of which are closely related to Calvinism. The Dutch Reformed ministers inspired the pioneering South Africans of 300 years ago with verses from the Old Testament, relating their struggles in a new land with the struggles of the ancient Hebrews in the deserts of the Middle East more than 20 centuries earlier. The Afrikaners were encouraged to see themselves as similar to the Jews, a “Chosen People” specially blessed by God and bringing Godly ways to a new and hostile land. The Afrikaner’s Great Trek was seen as their “Exodus” into a “Promised Land,” and the parallel with the ancient Hebrews was a major part of their national identity.

When they fought against British rule, and the British Empire’s idea of integrating Blacks into their society, they didn’t base their fight on scientific or even practical ideas about race — they based it on loyalty to Calvinist doctrine, on the way of life that had, in their view, sprung from those doctrines, and on the ungodly ”Enlightenment” ideas — the worship of supposed reason, instead of God — followed by their British adversaries. So, when the Apartheid policies of racial separation and self-determination were established in South Africa, they were justified in large part by scripture. It wasn’t so much that “the races should develop separately or our precious genetic heritage will be wiped out” but rather that “the races should develop separately because that is what Jehovah commands in His holy book” and “Jehovah’s holy book brought us safely to this land and we must follow its teachings.”

But anyone who looks at the multiplicity of Christian sects can see that there are hundreds, even thousands, of different and mutually exclusive teachings supposedly based on those same scriptures. And it’s almost as easy to see how Christian teachings change over time: Some of the very same churches that inspired Europeans to fight to keep Islam out of Europe now teach us that we must welcome Islamic invaders; many of the same churches that once rejected homosexual perversion and called it a sin, now say it’s a sin not to support homosexual marriage — for but two examples.

So it’s not surprising that after several decades of the world’s richest ethnic group working to undermine Apartheid, and after getting all the mainline churches in their corner — and even getting the World Council of Churches to kick out the Dutch Reformed Church for its supposed “racism” — that new clerics eventually came to power in that church, clerics who suddenly “discovered” that Jesus and Yahweh actually meant exactly the opposite of what the church had said they meant yesterday. In 1992, two years before the referendum on the new constitution, the South African church issued an edict calling Apartheid – which the church had been instrumental in creating in 1948 — a “sin.”

And, since the loyalty of the Afrikaners was more to their church than to their race, since their very identity itself was more bound up in their religion than in their blood, a large number of them voted as their church evidently wanted them to vote. And so the Whites handed over total power to the Black communists of the ANC.

There were other factors, too, including the total corruption of the major White political party in South Africa, the National Party, but these two examples are enough to illustrate my point: The South African people’s loyalty to their sports teams — and their loyalty to their church — were enough to tip the scales in favor of political and racial suicide in that sad country.

And sad it is, too. Since the imposition of Black rule in South Africa, the country has rapidly descended into chaos, filth, disease, madness, tyranny, and genocide. South Africa is the AIDS capital of the world, with over 17% of the adult population being infected — but its then-president Thabo Mbeki claimed in 2000 that AIDS is not caused by HIV and hundreds of thousands died as a result; South Africa is the rape capital of the world — one in four men admitted raping someone, half of them admitting they’d raped more than one person, and one in three South African women said they’d been raped in the past year; and the South African government turns a blind eye as roving gangs of Blacks murder White farmers by the thousands. South Africa under White rule was a First World nation, outstanding in science, medicine, and technology. South Africa today is a Third World hellhole.

If the White South Africans had been loyal to their people first, loyal to themselves, their families, their nation, and their race, this could never have happened. When the Jews and their collaborators tried to use sports and new interpretations of scripture to get them to hand over total political power to the Blacks, they would have said “Hell, no! We won’t sign over our right to rule ourselves to the Black majority — or to anyone! Having our own government and our own territory is absolutely essential for our survival. Being ruled by Blacks is a death warrant for our sons and daughters — and anyone who wants to kill our sons and daughters is our enemy and will be treated as such.”

They wouldn’t have cared much about whether or not their soccer team could play in London or Los Angeles — or whether some minister said it was a “sin” to do whatever it took to survive as a race. They would have booted the suicidal preacher out of their church as unfit to lead and apt to mislead those in his charge. And they would have laughed in the face of anyone who tried to use a sports boycott to get them to commit national suicide. They would have just organized their own championship games — and kept on developing advanced weapon systems just in case the group behind the boycotters decided to attack them when the boycotts didn’t work.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:37 AM   #208
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default That’s what a sane people, with their natural, healthy loyalties intact, would have d

That’s what a sane people, with their natural, healthy loyalties intact, would have done. But it’s not what the White people of South Africa actually did.

For the “honor and glory” of their cricket team, and because someone wearing a clerical collar told them so, they gave up the political power they absolutely needed for survival — and condemned their children to murder, rape, disease, and life as a hated and dwindling minority.

* * *

Now it’s easy to dismiss people who would trade their freedom for their sports team’s success, but don’t we White Americans display the same kind of misguided loyalty?

Haven’t millions of us given our loyalty to a sports team? Don’t we put the team’s symbols on our cars, on our clothing, sometimes even on our homes themselves to show our loyalty? Don’t we spend many days every year watching the games? Don’t we rearrange our lives so we don’t miss the playoffs or the “big game”? Isn’t this almost as much loyalty as we show to our own family members? And we do this even though we know that our “home team” is nothing but a corporation with “hired gun” players who have no connection whatever with our home town? — even though we know that these hired guns are often Blacks or other non-Whites whose degenerate lifestyle often includes sexual defilement of White women? What a disgusting display.

We humans are social creatures. We naturally crave belonging to a group, and our healthy instinct is to give our loyalty to that group. That group would naturally be our tribe, our race, our nation. But we have been raised wrong, we have been misled into transferring our loyalty to an artificial creation like a sports franchise.

And you’d better believe that the “integration” of sports wasn’t so much about supposed “fairness” as it was about transferring our “home team” loyalty to a gang of non-Whites. If you and your family “always loved the Steelers” or whatever, then if you wanted to keep up that traditional loyalty, you had to “love” the Africans who comprised a large part of the team now too. That’s what it was all about, and it worked on us just like it worked on the South Africans. The only difference is that we had a White majority in America back then, so “civil rights” and multiracial democracy have been slower in bringing America to the Third World level than they have in South Africa. But the same tribe that pushed “integration” and “civil rights” was busy opening the borders and now they’ve managed to darken America to the point that a majority of births in this country are non-White now. It won’t be long, just one or two generations perhaps, and America will be South Africa writ large.

We’ve even allowed the culture destroyers to redefine our nation so its “new meaning” has nothing to do with race or kinship, and in fact stands opposed to racial integrity and love of one’s own. Loyalty to what America has become is for all practical purposes disloyalty to your own people.

The mostly-Jewish masters of the media have denigrated loyalty to one’s race — at least if you’re White — as “racism,” and made it into a taboo so strong that many of us are filled with fear at the thought of being so labeled. So, for millions of White Americans, that instinct to group loyalty has no natural outlet. And the media masters and many opportunists of the business world are happy to provide us with substitutes.

I’m sure you’ve seen the Chevy pickup trucks with anti-Ford cartoons or slogans on them, and the converse. Loyalty to an automobile brand! Loyalty to a rock band or genre of music is shown by millions of t-shirts and bumper stickers. Loyalty to a political party can approach insane fanaticism: “Your” president or candidate can do no wrong, even if he violates every single pledge he made to you during the campaign; and the opposition party is evil incarnate. It’s not a matter of what’s right or wrong — it’s not a matter of what’s best for the nation — and it’s certainly never, ever a matter of what’s best for the race — it’s all a matter of which team you’re on, and you give your full loyalty to that team, be it Democrat or Republican. It doesn’t matter that the positions taken by your team mutate every few years as the political strategists hold their fingers to the winds of mob opinion. It doesn’t matter if the two “opposing” teams are close friends and drinking buddies when the cameras aren’t on — or that they almost always hold the same positions on issues important to the Jews, like wars for Israel, mass non-White immigration, and the evils of “racism” and “anti-Semitism.” What matters is that “your team” comes out a winner. That’s where your loyalty lies. And the globalist Zionist oligarch Rupert Murdoch loves the fact that so many White Americans give their loyalty to his Fox News channel, which pretends to oppose the oligarchs in a few unimportant but extremely noisy ways.

It’s not as easy to dismiss people who put loyalty to their religion first. Like the South Africans, many White Americans define themselves by their faith. If you woke them up from a sound sleep at three o’clock in the morning and abruptly asked them “What are you?” many would respond, “I’m a Baptist,” or “I’m a Catholic,” or “I’m a Christian,” or the like. Like the Afrikaners, they primarily define themselves by what they believe. But what you believe is, for most of the faithful, largely defined by a priesthood or hierarchy — and we have seen how that hierarchy can be influenced to change its positions on vital issues by 180 degrees in just a few decades: In 1948, the Dutch Reformed Church virtually invented Apartheid, and in 1992 it declared Apartheid to be a sin. What you believe is changeable. You can change your beliefs — or be influenced to change them — many times in one lifetime. Some of us can change them, repeatedly, in a single year; the more easily influenced sort of person — the kind who bears the unmistakable stamp of whoever it is he last talked to — can change his beliefs many times in a single day. Even the best of us adjust our beliefs based on our growing apprehension of reality.

All brave and honest men stand up for their sincere beliefs, whether they were taught them as a child or acquired them through the hard lessons of life. But giving your primary loyalty to — and defining yourself by — a belief system leaves you open to manipulation, to error, and even to extinction.

What you believe is changeable. What you are, on the other hand — what you actually are — is immutable and potentially eternal. What you actually are is a life form on planet Earth — specifically, a particular kind of life form: a member of a human race which is now evolving apart from the other human races.

It is in your nature to recognize others of your kind, to choose your mate from among them, and to continue the evolutionary flow of life that is your race by having White children. It is in your nature, and in accord with the very structure of Life itself, to be loyal to others of your kind, and to give and to sacrifice so that future generations of your kind will continue to live on when you are gone.

It is this natural racial loyalty that is the basis of the nation — the word “nation” itself is derived from the Latin word for “birth.” A nation is a group of people of common birth, common descent, common race. Rightly understood, the nation is a subset of the race, and by definition must be comprised of one race, and one race only. The word “patriotism” has its root in common with the Latin word for “father.” To be a patriot is to fight for your fatherland, for your kin who share the same ancestry as you. To be a patriot is to be loyal to your race and nation. That kind of loyalty is natural. If we intend to survive, that kind of loyalty must come before any other loyalty. It is essential. We must have it or we are done for.

If we put loyalty to our political party higher in our scale of values than loyalty to our race, we can be manipulated into a situation where one or the other must be sacrificed — and we will let our race die so we can win the next election.

If we put loyalty to a red-white-and-blue piece of cloth over loyalty to our race, then we will end up fighting on the wrong side if our enemies stage a coup and take over the government that flies that flag — as they most assuredly have already done.

If we put loyalty to a church higher in our scale of values than loyalty to our race, then whenever the interests of our people, of our race, come into conflict with those of the church hierarchy, we will let our race be harmed, or even die — so that our church can gain new converts, or thrive in a new social climate, or whatever the church leadership decides is necessary.

We in the National Alliance are different. We don’t just want to continue American life as it is, but with some White rights added to the mix. No. We know that won’t work. We don’t just want, as the better kind of conservatives do, to “restore the Constitution” and return to the laws of the Founders — because we know that’s not enough to do the job. The Founders in the first American Congress — some of them the same men who framed the Constitution — did create the Naturalization Act of 1790, which stated that only those of European descent could become citizens. That Act, and the innumerable laws of the various states banning racial mixture and the like, and the voluminous correspondence of the men who wrote those laws and the membership of many of them in the American Colonization Society (the purpose of which was to repatriate Blacks to the continent of Africa), show beyond any doubt that the Founders intended for America to be a White nation. But all of those good intentions, and all of those laws, were not enough to prevent the subversion of our republic and its conversion into a multiracial democracy.

The National Alliance stands for a new society, organized on the basis of racial loyalty as its first and unchangeable value — a new constitution with the eternal racial integrity and racial progress of our people as its very reason for being — a new educational system which has the encouragement and augmentation of the natural racial loyalty of our young people as its first principle – a new government which is comprised of, and answerable to, our people alone — and a large self-sustaining territory exclusively for our people and for no one else. Without these basic requirements, we are doomed as a race and nation. They are non-negotiable. And they are non-negotiable because they are essential.

If you agree that we must stand together, no matter what the odds, to achieve our goal of a new White nation — to let nothing stand in our way or discourage us — and give our highest loyalty to our race and our new nation in the making — then I ask you to join your efforts to ours today.

* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:57 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:41 AM   #209
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Liberty

American Dissident Voices: Liberty

American Dissident Voices broadcast of February 1, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/02/...oices-liberty/

LIBERTARIANISM is a tempting philosophy for White Americans who are disgusted by what their government has become. Libertarians vary somewhat in their perspectives, but their point of view can be summarized in Henry David Thoreau’s statement that “government is best which governs least.”


Because he wanted to cut the monster in Washington
down to size, Ron Paul’s libertarian ideas were
supported by many White Americans. But is “smaller
government” really the answer?


I confess I have a great deal of sympathy with that idea. It is in my nature, and I think in the nature of many White people, to value freedom highly. We want to be able to reason things out for ourselves — what is right, what is wrong; what is the purpose of our lives; how we should spend our time; how we should allocate our wealth and goods; and with whom we choose to associate — and not associate.

People of quality don’t want or need an overlord, or a policeman on every corner, to tell us what to do or not to do. We don’t want or need an all-encompassing spy system to listen in on every conversation, or take satellite pictures of every living room and bedroom, to make sure we are “safe” from largely imaginary terrorists. We don’t want killer drones run remotely by politicians and bureaucrats armed with a “kill list” of their own devising. We don’t want or need ten million regulations telling us how to run our business affairs and potentially sending us to jail if we fail to hire enough Eskimos or Hottentots, or forget to dot the “i” in paragraph C3 of form 8942.

We admire the founders of the USA, who set strict limits on what their new government could and could not do, and enshrined the rights of the people as inviolate. We don’t admire the lawyers and the judges who have figured out thousands of “legal” tricks and weasel words to get around those limitations — and who have built the most powerful and intrusive state apparatus since the one set up by Uncle Joe Stalin.

We acknowledge — and shudder when we do so — that, in just the last 100 years, governments have killed their own people on massive scale, a scale that dwarfs the death toll from every war fought during that same century. More than 40 million died in wars, but the Communists in the Jewish-dominated Soviet Union killed some 4 million Russians in 1921 and 1922 alone, purposely starved 8 million Ukrainians in 1932, and conservative estimates are that politically-motivated executions topped 40 million Russians before Stalin’s death in 1953. During World War I, the Ottoman Turks starved more than a million of their Armenian citizens. After World War 2, at least two million German civilians were slaughtered, and at least a 200,000 Germans died in Allied concentration camps set up by Eisenhower. Another two million White people, ethnic Germans, Russians, and other nationalities who had fled Communism during the war, were killed when Eisenhower “repatriated” them by force to the Soviet Union. Mao’s Chinese Communist government killed a million Tibetans under its rule, and also killed some 30 million of its own people.

It’s a sorry record, and I can understand why some people turn away in disgust at the very idea of government. I can understand why the idea of absolute individual autonomy appeals to them — as I survey the sorry and bloody record of America’s recent history, it even appeals to me.

I can understand why the great American writer and thinker Albert Jay Nock titled one of his books Our Enemy, the State. In that book, Nock — who once argued, by the way, that Jews were basically incompatible with European civilization — brought out the fact that society and the state are two different things. He said that the state, created to serve society, often ends up opposing it — opposing the very society it is supposed to serve. It ends up as the enemy of the people. The state acts like a malignant tumor, with its own agenda and its own interests, often diametrically opposed to the body of people who first brought it into being. That’s certainly what’s happening in America and the West generally right now: State power is being systematically used to erase people of European descent from the face of the Earth, via mass immigration, wholesale replacement, and the promotion of racial mixing. The “state as the enemy of the people” can’t get much worse than that.

So perhaps we should embrace the anarcho-libertarian ideal. Perhaps we should even go further than Thoreau’s “that government is best which governs least” and follow him all the way to what he also said, though it’s seldom quoted — “that government is best which governs not at all.”

Or perhaps we should take the more moderate position of libertarians like Ron Paul or the many patriots who just want us to restore the Constitution and the much more limited government that prevailed in the Old America.

First let’s dispense with the anarcho-libertarian idea. It’s difficult to imagine a more impractical and ephemeral way of life for any nation. In fact, anarchism virtually dispenses with the very idea of a nation, and presumes that voluntary interactions among free men and women will result in a kind of spontaneous order in which all human needs will be taken care of without any need for force or compulsion.

As appealing as this idea is to those living under the yoke of the Washington regime, it utterly ignores the biological and psychological nature of human beings. It ignores the fact that humans naturally organize themselves along biological lines — racial lines — and that the different peoples thus delineated have different, and often clashing, interests. It ignores the fact that, whether organized into racial groups or into gangs of warlords looking for plunder, human groups will arm themselves and fight for territory and resources, fight to establish hegemony or to break free of oppression. It ignores the essentially territorial and warlike nature of man. And it ignores the biological, tribal, racial nature of man.

Weapons exist. Men with an inclination to organize themselves and use those weapons to get what they want exist. Even if we are living in anarcho-capitalist Utopia, there exist other powerful states which may covet our territory and note our stateless weakness and invade us. History shows that these things are a part of human nature and they have happened countless times — and there is no reason to suppose they will not happen to us. Therefore it is a necessity for us to organize ourselves for the common defense, for our young men to train themselves and stand ready to put their lives at risk to defend their people, for a justice system to be put in place so that the deranged and the criminal within our own borders can be made harmless — and for all of us to contribute to those efforts.

In other words, we need a state — we need a government. Some things must be done as a community, or we will surely perish. Without a state, we will be like the stateless Armenians ruled by the Ottoman Empire, helpless before the sword of those who hate us.

* * *

But what about severely limiting the power of the state, so that it cannot become oppressive and cannot intrude into too many spheres of life? What about the moderately libertarian idea of returning America to constitutional, limited government?

This idea is very appealing indeed. I’d estimate that fully 90 per cent. of what the regime in Washington does is harmful or stupid, and, judged by the standard of the Constitution, illegal too. Practically all of the anti-White legislation imposed by the regime, like “Affirmative Action” and forced association under the guise of “civil rights,” falls into the illegal category and so would be swept away by a restoration of the Constitution. Wouldn’t it be great to be rid of almost everything the beast on the Potomac is doing to kill us? And we wouldn’t even have to mention race at all!

And I admit that the founders who wrote the Constitution intended for America to be an all-White nation (though the current crop of Constitutionalists deny or fail to mention this). When the Founders said the new government was instituted to secure the blessings of liberty for their posterity, they meant by that word their lineal descendants and kin — fellow White men and women — and no one else. They made that clear when they defined citizenship, in the Naturalization Act of 1790, as applying only to those of European descent — a law which remained on the books until 1952. Jefferson himself authored a law outlawing racial mixing in the state of Virginia, so we know where he stood on the issue. And many early American leaders supported the American Colonization Society, the purpose of which was to free the Blacks and remove them from our society by repatriating them to Africa. In fact, until the administration of the second Roosevelt, the view that America was a White nation was basically the norm among American citizens and leaders.

But returning to the original limited government interpretation of the Constitution isn’t going to save us. It isn’t likely to happen, either, in the increasingly Third World feeding and breeding zone that America has become.

The reasons are these: The nature and quality of a society is totally dependent on the men and women who make it up. The laws and constitution of that society matter to some degree, but nowhere near as much as the inner nature of the people who comprise it. And the people who make up American society have changed radically since 1789.

When America granted independence to the Philippines, we handed them a constitution closely modeled on the American Constitution. But that didn’t make Philippine society resemble American society of that time in any significant way. Theirs was basically a Mestizo society, riddled from the beginning with extensive corruption — and within a few years their constitution was basically being ignored and their president was ruling by decree.

When the African country of Liberia was set up by the American Colonization Society, it was also given a constitution modeled on ours. But you might as well have handed the American Constitution to a troop of baboons for all the good it did. Liberia was and continues to be a sinkhole of primitivism, poverty, chaos, corruption, disease, and death. The Americanized constitution mattered not a bit.

The American Constitution was created by a specific group of people, and in many ways it worked for a time because it was particularly well suited to the kind of people who inhabited this country. Early America was a cultural and genetic colony of Europe, and its citizens, all Europeans, were in addition selected to be on the average more adventurous, courageous, and freedom-loving than their compatriots who stayed safely at home. These were men and women who were seeking a home where they could be free of the dessicated old aristocracy, where they could clear new land, fight off savages, and build a whole new world for themselves. They didn’t appreciate it when an effete and banker-ridden aristocracy started telling them what to do from 4,000 miles away — and many of them determined to be free or die in the attempt. It was men like that who brought the Constitution and its concept of limited government into being. And, with many exceptions, they made it work pretty well for a century and a half.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:42 AM   #210
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,031
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Liberty...continued

But late in the 19th century, the Jews, a very different people, started arriving on our shores in significant numbers. They weren’t interested in clearing the land. They weren’t interested in freedom. They were interested in ownership, in control. They were interested in stock exchange and banking tricks to take without effort what others had created over many decades. They were interested in dominance through control of our mass media. They were interested in power. Most of all, they didn’t melt and assimilate into the White American population as the other immigrant groups of Europeans had. Deep down, they didn’t consider themselves European, though they had sojourned in Europe for centuries. They were interested in what was best for them, even if it wasn’t what was best for us. They didn’t trust us and wanted to control us. And to do that, they needed to dominate our government, and break the chains of the Constitution in order to make that government more powerful.

The Jews didn’t think it was in their best interest for America to be a White nation, so one of their priorities was to overturn all the laws which protected the borders of the United States, and all the laws which protected the racial integrity of the United States. And this they have done, flooding the country with so many millions of Third Worlders and encouraging racial mixing to such an extent that today more non-White babies are being born than White babies in this country, a sure sign of the permanent racial change to come.

Do you think that the increasingly disunited and darkening population of what is still called the “United States of America” could do much better than the Filipinos and Liberians with a “restored” constitution? Do you think they would have even the slightest interest in such an idea in the first place, especially considering that the illegitimate power of the regime in Washington is what is allowing them in and subsidizing them to the tune of billions of dollars?

No, that’s a pipe dream. There will be no “restoration of the Constitution.” None of that is going to happen. Ever.

Even if we just had to consider the White American population, “restoring the Constitution” would still be a non-starter. More than two generations have passed since something resembling limited government existed in this country. Millions of White Americans have become dependent on government jobs and assistance during those years. They’ve become attached to the big government teat and are willing to endorse whatever malicious nonsense issues forth from Washington, from homosexuality to racial mixing and the genocide of their own people, just because they know where their monthly check comes from and nothing – nothing — is more important than that.

And there’s yet another reason that “restoring the Constitution” won’t work. It’s been said truthfully that there is no substitute for honorable men. No matter what political system you establish, even if it is far less than optimal — if it is run by honorable men, loyal to their people, who are also capable and responsible, that system will work as well as it possibly can. And even if you have the most perfect political system imaginable, designed for us by beneficent and omniscient angels — if it is run by dishonorable, corrupt men, it will be an imposture and a disaster.

Our “leaders” in America today are not honorable men. They are men who have been put in place by a system loyal to money and the men who have it — and in America, no one has more money than the Jews. These are not men who will give up power on principle. They have no principles.

The politicians and the judges who have twisted the words of the Constitution until it means almost precisely the opposite of what it was intended to mean are not going to stand idly by while their racket is being disassembled and scrapped. They will order their law enforcement agencies to arrest and prosecute anyone who comes too close to shutting down their game. They will use every dirty trick in the book to put an end to anyone who really tries. There’s going to be no serious limitation on state power in this country, despite all the phony rhetoric of conservatives to the contrary. State power is only going to grow, because the Jews and the other super-rich who are allied with them, and the politicians who serve them, and the non-Whites who use that power as a club to steal our wealth, want it to grow.

Yes, I’d personally like a less intrusive state, a state that, except for necessities, left me and my family alone most of the time — that didn’t spy on me or intrude on my privacy — that didn’t hem me in with millions of regulations — and especially one that didn’t bleed me dry to support, and force me to associate with, those who belong on the other side of an ocean from me and mine.

But far more important than the size of the state — far more important even than the power of the state — as important as those things are to every freedom-loving man or woman — far, far more important is whose state it is.

For we as a people need a state. We need laws to protect us from violence and from corruption. We need a common defense against invaders, to secure the borders of our living space. We need an educational system that teaches our young people to understand their great heritage and enables them to participate in our unique culture, adding to it with each passing generation. We need a honorable and just legal system to protect our property, our rights, and our families. We need a money system that fairly rewards the worker and the artist and the businessman and the saver — and does not steal from us through debt or inflation. We need to support scientific research for defense, for exploration of the Universe, and for greater understanding of how we can and should decide the course of our future evolution.

We have none of these things today. Our enemies have stolen our state from us.

The regime in Washington is now the deadly enemy of the founding race that brought it into being. Its money system was designed from its inception to steal from the honest and to reward the dishonest. Its “justice” system is utterly corrupt and ruled by money, and is used whenever possible to persecute dissidents who expose its crimes. Its scientific research is increasingly used to find new ways to kill innocents overseas in the service of Israel, and to spy on us at home. Its military is never to be seen defending our borders — but is constantly waging war for Zionist hegemony in the Middle East. Our enemies have stolen our state from us.

So arguing over whether the government is too big and needs to be made smaller for the sake of liberty is a pointless argument. It is a waste of time. It is a waste of our lives. Because, as the System is set up now, barring total disaster, the size and power of government can only ratchet upward. And the size of this government should be the last thing we’re worried about anyway, since we no longer have a government of our own. Without that, we are lost. Without that, there is no liberty. We will only be free when we have a government that is answerable to us and only to us.

All our efforts and every minute of our lives should be dedicated to obtaining state power for our people once again.

To do that, we must separate ourselves from the “United States of America” and the criminal gang who now control the illegal entity in Washington.

To do that, we must think not in terms of reform or election — never! — and think only in terms of secession, separation, and withdrawal of support and consent.

To do that, more than anything else, we must know who we are. Teaching our people who we are is one of the fundamental tasks of our Alliance. If we don’t understand that, there will be no center, no cohesion, no state power for us — because there will be no us.

The National Alliance consists of men and women of European descent who are awake to their peril and their possible great destiny. We are determined that our people not only have a future, but a future glorious beyond all our dreams. By participating in our Alliance you participate in our people’s awakening. I invite you to join us in this, the only cause that really matters.

* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the new National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:58 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 PM.