Liveleak Forums  

Go Back   Liveleak Forums > Special Interest Forums > All Special Interest Topics > Political thought / philosophy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2014, 01:45 AM   #211
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Do You Still Think You Have a Country?

American Dissident Voices: Do You Still Think You Have a Country?

Broadcast of February 8, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom


The SS America, abandoned and beached off the Canary Islands,
symbolizes what has happened to our country.


Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/02/...ave-a-country/

DO YOU STILL THINK you have a country? When I said last week that our enemies had stolen our state from us, some listeners responded with derision. The letter-writers weren’t hostile Jews or Blacks or Mestizos. They were White Americans. In fact they were racially conscious White Americans.

One was a student who was hoping for a career with the ATF or the Border Patrol. He firmly believed that that with just a few more good conservative White men in the right “law enforcement” positions, we could straighten things out pretty quickly in this country. Another was a young man in the military, and he was sure that “whipping the asses” of those “Arab terrorists” would send a message that America wasn’t down and out but stronger than ever, and our “freedoms” would be secure.

These men, I think, are willfully blind. They don’t want to see the whole truth of how we’ve lost our country — how the state has been stolen from us — because it’s too painful; because they’d have to realize they are functionaries and literal slaves of those who want to exterminate them; because then they’d have to change their career plans, or at least become monkey-wrenchers and kiss all hopes of a cushy pension goodbye. Mainly I think they want to believe that America is still theirs because they are weak and emotionally dependent on the idea — their very identity is wrapped up in it, and they can’t face a world in which it isn’t true.

But it isn’t true.

These men remind me of the absurd characters in the old BBC comedy The Goon Show. Often, when someone told them an unpleasant but obvious fact, they would simply respond “I don’t wish to know that!” And that settled it. Since they didn’t like the truth, they simply refused to acknowledge it, as if that would make it go away. That kind of denial is a pretty common human characteristic. The degenerate Romans who kept on partying and engaging in orgies while the barbarians were advancing, street by street, through their city are another example.

But people, like those Romans, and like those letter writers, who deny reality can never be truly free. They can never be masters of their destiny. They can never really deal with the challenges life has to offer, because they don’t even know what those challenges are, much less know how to defeat them. Knowing what is really happening is a prerequisite for meaningful action. The only action those letter writers will ever know — unless they wake up — is obeying orders.

* * *

Do you still think you have a country? President Obama has just nominated Janet Yellen to be Chairman of the Federal Reserve, possibly the greatest position of economic power in the world. The Federal Reserve is the quasi-public, privately-owned central bank that has near-total control of the money supply, interest rates, the banking “industry,” and in fact the entire economy of the United States. Every single dollar that is added to the money supply — and every single dollar that the “Fed” lends to the regime – earns interest for the banking system of which the Fed is the center. Janet Yellen is Jewish.

And not only is Janet Yellen Jewish, so was her predecessor Ben Bernanke — and so was his predecessor, Alan Greenspan. In fact, every chairman of the Federal Reserve since 1987 — 27 years ago — has been a Jew. And every candidate that Barack Obama considered for the position — Donald Kohn, Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, Stanley Fischer, Roger Ferguson, and Yellen — is Jewish except Geithner and Ferguson, who’s a Black man with a Jewish wife.

What are the chances that the Jewish minority — only about two per cent. of the US population — should hold such a monopoly on the Fed chairmanship? If they were represented in proportion to their percentage of the population, there should be 49 non-Jewish chairmen for every Jewish one. But since the Reagan administration it’s been all Jews. Do you still think you have a country?

Even the Jewish writer Steven Weiss, writing in Tablet magazine, which bills itself as “a new read on Jewish life,” is crowing about Jewish supremacy at the Fed:

“Yellen’s ascent to the post will also guarantee that, by the end of her first term, Jews will have occupied the Fed’s top post for three decades straight – an unprecedented run of Jewish power and influence. The chairman’s seat hasn’t been occupied by a non-Jew since 1987, when Alan Greenspan was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to follow Paul Volcker. With the succession of Ben Bernanke in 2006, under President George W. Bush, and now the appointment of Yellen by President Barack Obama, it’s worth remembering that there is a concept in Jewish thought called chazakah: When something happens three times, it can be considered permanent. Applied to the Federal Reserve, it would suggest an impossibly firm grasp on a degree of power the likes of which the Jewish people have never known.”

Do you still think you have a country?

And that’s not all. Now that Janet Yellen is chairman of the Federal Reserve, who do you think Barack Obama has nominated to replace her as vice chairman and likely front-runner for chairman when Yellen’s term runs out? Well, using his own independent best judgement, without any outside influence I’m sure, Obama has nominated none other than Stanley Fischer, a Jew who not only was not born in the United States but in Zambia, of all places, but who until just a few months ago was the governor of the Bank of Israel. Do you still think you have a country?

* * *

The mass media of news and entertainment have a vast influence on society. Outside of what a person has experienced personally — what he or she has actually seen with his own eyes, learned in school, or heard from a friend or loved one — almost everything we think we know about the world, everything we think we know about current events, everything we think we know about our political leaders, comes to us carefully selected and filtered by the mass media.

The mass media set the fashion trends. They select which four or five stories are worthy of being mentioned during the evening news or put on the front page — and which stories are buried on page D7 or are never mentioned at all. They decide what “spin” to put on those stories. They decide who the “good guys” are in any conflict — and the “bad.” They tell the talking-head newscasters when to express outrage and disapproval — and against whom. They create heroes and superstars in their dramas and comedies, and they put words in their mouths for the public to follow. They decide which bands will get maximum airplay, which lyrics will get stuck in the head of your teenage son or daughter. They set the limits of public debate, and decide who is too “radical,” right or left, to be included. They maintain massive files on all public figures and activists in cooperation with ethnically-based private intelligence agencies like the SPLC and the ADL, and they have moles (which they call “sources”) in law enforcement and secret police agencies too, so that scandals can be manufactured almost at will anytime a politician or other official “gets out of line,” destroying his career almost overnight.

No power is our society is greater than that of the media. They have an absolute stranglehold on the political process in our mass democracy. And the media in the United States are almost entirely under the ownership and control of the two per cent. — of the Jewish minority.

The “big six” media corporations in America are CBS, NBC Universal, News Corporation (owner of Fox News), now 21st Century Fox, Time Warner, Viacom, and the Walt Disney Company (which owns ABC). Of the twelve senior executives of these corporations, if Jews were represented among them at the same percentage they are represented in the American population, one would expect that at most one of them would be Jewish. But such is not the case. Of these twelve senior executives, nine are Jews — a representation of 75 per cent. In calculating the 75 per cent. figure, I’m not even counting Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corporation (now 21st Century Fox) and Fox News, as Jewish, despite his appearance, despite the fact that his grandmother was undoubtedly Jewish and despite the fact that he fanatically supports Zionism and other Jewish causes.

The Executive Chairman of both CBS and Viacom is Sumner Redstone, a Jew whose MTV channel is one of the worst offenders in degrading our young people with filth and promotion of racial mixing. The CEO of CBS is Leslie Moonves, also Jewish — in fact, he’s the great-nephew of David ben-Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel. The Chairman and CEO of Comcast, which owns NBC Universal is Brian L. Roberts, a Jew who has even participated in the international Jewish athletic event, the Maccabiah Games, in Israel. Philippe Dauman, a Jew, is the President and CEO of Viacom, and also sits on the board of a New York Jewish health system and is a United Jewish Appeal honoree. Robert Iger, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Disney/ABC, is a Jew who also was named “Ambassador for Humanity” by Steven Spielberg’s USC Shoah Foundation. Disney’s senior vice president is attorney Alan Braverman, also a Jew.

And that’s just the beginning — look at the presidents of other media companies: CNN — Jeffrey Zucker; MGM — Jonathan Glickman; MTV — Stephen Friedman; USA Today — Larry Kramer; Comedy Central — Doug Herzog; Reuters — Stephen Adler; Los Angeles Times — Eddy Hartenstein; Discovery Network — David Zaslav; Yahoo — Marissa Mayer; Marvel Comics — Isaac Perlmutter; Hulu — Andy Forsell; Touchstone Pictures — Alan Bergman; HBO — Eric Kessler. I could go on and on, and the list of CEOs and Chairmen is just as heavily Jewish.

So 75 per cent. of the top executives of major media companies in America are Jews — controlling almost all that you and your family see and hear about the world. That is an over-representation of 3,650 per cent. Do you still think you have a country?

* * *

Jewish control of the media and the Fed is not the end of the story, though. Wall Street — that fantastic casino of ownership and speculation whose creation of derivatives has brought about a virtual private currency for the super-rich and whose death grip on the political process has infamously caused Washington to bail out brazen financial criminals to the tune of dozens of billions of dollars — is also a Jewish preserve.

According to Who Controls America? “Of the fifty-one senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies, thirty-seven are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies by a factor of 36 times (3,600 percent).”

Furthermore, according to the same source, “Of the forty senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages, twenty-six are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250 percent).”

Do you still think you have a country?

* * *

When you think about the degree of control that the tiny Jewish minority has over the United States, and the great danger that poses for the rest of us, you need not regard Jews in any kind of “demonic” light — though there is indeed something special, something hyper-ethnocentric, about them. No. You need only realize that with their unity, they have taken over the levers of power in our society, and that they are strongly conscious of themselves as a special, separate people, with interests that are not necessarily our interests. They are a foreign people who have, for all practical purposes, taken over the function of the ruling class in America, displacing the old White ruling class and forcing even elite Whites into a kind of secondary, managerial, or employee status. This foreign people, furthermore, sees the replacement of Whites worldwide with non-White immigrants as being in their best interest, and they are pursuing that policy with a vengeance — not only in the United States, where they are flooding us with Mestizos and Third Worlders of every description, but in Europe too, where a Muslim invasion of unprecedented proportions is taking place under Jewish supervision. It’s happening in Australia and New Zealand, too, where the Jewish leadership is solidly behind replacing Whites with Asians as fast as possible.

Do you still think you have a country?

Not only do we White Americans not have a country anymore, but most Europeans worldwide have lost theirs, too, and for the same reason. Only in Eastern Europe are some leaders resisting White suicide, and these leaders are increasingly under pressure from Jewish-dominated “Western” intelligence agencies and diplomats, and phony revolutionary movements funded by Jewish money.

It’s time for White people to start thinking racially. It’s time for a new kind of nationalism — racial nationalism. It’s time for a new kind of community in which helping your fellow White man and White woman comes before private profit and advantage. It’s time to realize that our spiritual heritage has nothing to do with worshipping a Semitic tribal god and everything to do with our people’s evolution to a higher level of consciousness and understanding. It’s time for the National Alliance.

* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the new National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:49 PM. Reason: Added link to disclaimer and to Buyer Beware!
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:47 AM   #212
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default The New Cold War

American Dissident Voices: The New Cold War
Broadcast of February 15, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/02/...-new-cold-war/

[img]http://nationalvanguard.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/pyatt-nuland-cookies-500x350.jpg[img]
In a ridiculous propaganda stunt, Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt
offer cookies out of a plastic shopping bag to protesters in Kiev


IN UKRAINE LAST WEEK, a hacker — or possibly someone who works for Russian intelligence — intercepted a cell phone call between two functionaries of the Washington regime — Geoffrey Pyatt, the US ambassador to Ukraine, and Victoria Nuland, the Jewish Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, who was visiting Ukraine with the intention of overthrowing the government there. The hacker, or whatever he was, almost immediately arranged to have the intercepted conversation posted to YouTube, and it’s gone viral from there.

The controlled press made a big deal over Victoria Nuland’s dismissive comment during the call about the weakness of the European Union — she said “f*** the EU” and naturally the EU was miffed about that — so the media concentrated on that and pretty much ignored the really interesting thing about the conversation, probably on purpose, because the interesting part is a pretty damning indictment of US meddling in Ukraine.

We know the intercept is true and accurate, because the US State Department issued an apology for the “bad language” directed at the European Union, using the preposterous excuse that Nuland spent time as a young woman “on a Russian fishing boat” and might have learned “salty language” there. Good grief, could any apology be less to the point or more pathetic than that? And the US immediately blamed Russia for “wiretapping” the diplomats and releasing the recording, though they offered no proof that Russia had anything to do with it, an amazingly hypocritical complaint considering what the NSA is doing to all of us these days.

The really interesting thing about the conversation is that Victoria Nuland was essentially instructing the ambassador about which Ukrainian opposition figures should be chosen to lead the country, should the current US-backed coup attempt be successful. That — and not the commonplace four-letter word Nuland used — is the real news here.

The Jewish-dominated regime in Washington is trying to do what Jewish financier George Soros tried and failed to do a few years ago when he funded his so-called Orange Revolution in Ukraine. They are trying to topple the Ukrainian government, which currently has close ties with Russia, and install a puppet regime which can be used someday as a pawn against Russia, and also place Ukraine under the thumb of the Jewish banking and media oligarchs who currently dominate the West — and get Ukraine to toe the line in other ways, too, such as supporting the wars for Israeli hegemony continually raging in the Middle East, and accepting the suicidal multiracialism and mass immigration the oligarchs have forced on the West in order to decimate our race.


Compare the pamphlets issued by the US during the "Arab Spring"
revolution in Egypt with those found in the possession of Ukrainian
"protesters."


In case you don’t believe that Washington is behind the riots in Ukraine, even after hearing this intercepted conversation, consider this: Mass quantities of printed propaganda have been found among the protesters with text and pictures nearly identical to pamphlets issued by US intelligence and mass distributed in Egypt when the US was pushing for the installation of the hated Mohammed Morsi regime there. These same “change” pamphlets, with appropriate language translations of course, were also distributed by US intelligence in Serbia and Syria when phony revolutions were being fomented there — and now they are being used in Ukraine. Don’t fool yourself — Washington is actively plotting a coup in Ukraine in order to install a more obedient government there, and it’s part of an ongoing, decades-long program to bring the world under the domination of the same oligarchs who currently misrule the United States.

Victoria Nuland, by the way, is married to infamous neocon warmonger Robert Kagan, also Jewish, who was a co-founder of the Project for the New American Century, architects and early proponents of the illegal war in Iraq. Nuland herself was implicated in the coverup of the Benghazi attack. Her family’s original surname was Nudelman.

Ambassador Pyatt, though not a Jew, is an obedient servant of the System that signs his paychecks. I’ve been studying his efforts recently, and they are totally focused on convincing the Ukrainians to jettison Russia, join the EU, and align with the US. A speech he gave on October 29 at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy is full of oily promises of money and foreign “investment” and more money that will fall from the skies — so long as Ukraine obeys orders and signs the “Association Agreement” with the EU that Washington is pushing. In the course of his long and tedious ramblings, he said “the United States supports the Ukrainian people’s European choice. We are your friend in this enterprise. A sovereign, territorially sound, democratic, economically prosperous and European Ukraine has always been at the center of our hopes for our bilateral relationship. We stand ready to help Ukraine’s economy become connected to global markets, to help you strengthen your democratic processes and institutions, and to help you take advantage of the many changes coming your way.” Well, I suppose that not everything Ambassador Pyatt says is a lie. After all, US missile bases and branches of Citibank are indeed “changes.”

For about a decade now, a new Cold War has been brewing between the regime in Washington and Russia. But unlike the old Cold War, Russia no longer stands for Communism or world conquest, and America no longer stands for freedom. In many ways, the old roles have been reversed.

Russia is led by Vladimir Putin, who stands quite apart from — and, in many ways, opposed to — the Jewish-dominated United States. Putin is a nationalist. He puts Russia and Russians first. One of his first acts upon attaining power in Russia was to dispossess — and, in some cases, imprison — the Jewish oligarchs who had come to dominate Russia and strip her of her wealth under the US-linked administration of Boris Yeltsin. Read the article by Justin Cowgill I published in National Vanguard magazine, The Silent Coup, which details how the oligarchs were defeated. What Putin did was the equivalent of a nationalist president coming to power in the US and imprisoning or exiling the heads of the Fed, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, CBS, Viacom and all the rest of the vampires, and nationalizing their assets and ill-gotten gains. It was a real bloodless revolution.

Putin has flaws, to be sure. He persecutes more radical nationalists. He wants to hold on to the remnants of Russia’s old multiracial empire and so must take an official non-racialist position. For political reasons he can never question the righteousness of the so-called “Great Patriotic War.” But Putin has nevertheless stymied the plans of the illegal regime in Washington time and time again — in Syria he stopped another Zionist war from starting; in Iran he has blocked the warmongers again and again; he uses the national wealth to subsidize the birth of more White children; and Dimitry Rogozin, Putin’s deputy prime minister, has openly called for an alliance of European peoples against the threats from the Third World.

In contrast, America is acting more and more like the old “Evil Empire” of the Soviet Union. “Our” foreign policy is warlike; at the behest of Israel, we repeatedly invade and occupy nations that never harmed us or posed the slightest threat to our security, sometimes fighting multiple wars, overt and covert, simultaneously; we spy on our own citizens to an extent never even dreamed of by the KGB; we imprison more of our population than any nation on Earth; and we utterly ignore our own laws when it comes to flagrantly illegal acts by the financial oligarchs and by the government itself. We undermine any nation — from Iran to Serbia to now Russia — that wants to maintain its independence from the vipers of Wall Street and Hollywood. (In fact, it’s not even an exaggeration to say that the United States is now acting exactly the way Germany was accused of acting in World War 2 — trying to dominate the world by force.) And, worst of all, the Washington regime is encouraging and facilitating the genocide of the White race with all its power.

One of the really refreshing things about Ukraine is that both major political factions in the country are nationalists. One side, now in power, sees their current close relationship with Russia as the best guarantee of independence and freedom for their people. The other has a deep distrust of Russia, partly because Ukraine was a part of the old Czarist Russian Empire and later a part of the Jewish-dominated Soviet Union, under which millions of Ukrainians were purposely starved to death to bring them more firmly under the heel of Communism.

I am sure the oligarchs who give the orders in DC hate Ukrainians as much as they hate White Americans. But their primary goal right now is to weaken Russia. Turning Ukraine into a puppet of the Jews’ regime in Washington would be their fondest wish, and they are willing to hold their noses and pretend to befriend the pro-Western faction in Ukraine.

The pro-EU, pro-Western Ukrainian nationalists are being fed supplies, probably weapons, and huge amounts of money — some estimate 20 million dollars a day — by US intelligence agencies in hopes of bringing Ukraine under the bankers’ yoke and putting a hostile government, complete with “American” military bases, right next to Russia. Russia is currently the most powerful enemy the oligarchs face, and they want to destroy her. That’s what it’s all about.

The pro-EU, pro-US Ukrainian nationalists will be crushed as soon as they are no longer useful. They are being played for fools by the world’s wealthiest ethnic group, the Jews, who have played this game again and again. Look at what happened to one-time “US allies” Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. That “US ally” retirement plan is pretty damned harsh.

I fully believe the Vladimir Putin, despite his flaws, is not a man who will ever bow down to the moneyed elite that raped his nation. He does not want Russia to be a slave province of the Jews’ world plantation. And I also believe that the Jewish power structure cannot tolerate a nuclear-armed, advanced superpower with a leader who has shown himself to be well aware of their predatory and genocidal game, and they will not forgive what Putin did to their kin just a decade ago. Therefore I believe that a drive for war is coming — a war that could well be devastating for our race and nation.

I believe that in that war, the United States will be on the side of slavery and genocide, and Russia will be on the other side. I believe that anti-Russian propaganda will increase dramatically in the next few years. I believe that the manipulation of the homosexuals and their allies to hate Russia — even though there are countries in which homosexual behavior is punishable by death, and neither the perverts nor the Jewish media show any particular outrage against them — is just the latest salvo in a propaganda war which is going to get much, much bigger. In Sochi, the media are even now grasping at any straw they can find to portray Putin as a monster or an incompetent. I believe that “incidents” may be staged, using US or UK or Israeli intelligence assets inside Russia and its government, in which Americans will be harmed or killed, and Russians blamed — with the purpose being to anger Americans and justify a coup, or all-out war, against Russia. My advice: Don’t fall for the lies again. Warn your family members — inoculate them against the propaganda that is coming.

And do everything you can to build racial consciousness among our people. Teach them that the “enemies” trotted out and dangled before them on the television are not really our enemies. Our enemies are not in Tehran or Damascus or Moscow. Our enemies are in the counting-houses of New York and the dream factories of Los Angeles. Our enemies are those who have stolen our state from us. Don’t make war for that corrupt state. Don’t help it engineer coups against other nations who never did us any harm. Other peoples, including non-White peoples, who stand opposed to the Jewish oligarchs are not our enemies. Work for the day when we can reclaim our nation and have a real “regime change” in this country. Work for the day when Americans, Russians, Germans, and all the peoples of our European civilization will earn their freedom and self-determination once again.

* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:50 PM. Reason: Added Disclaimer and Buyer Beware! link.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:50 AM   #213
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default America, Race, and Violent Crime

American Dissident Voices: America, Race, and Violent Crime

Broadcast of February 22, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom
Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/02/...violent-crime/


Top: Richmond, Virginia’s Harvey family — brutally
murdered: Ruby, 4, Stella, 9, Kathryn, 39, and
Bryan, 49. Bottom: Ray Dandridge and Ricky Gray,
arrested for the Harvey murders and a string of
other killings


ONE HORRIFIC SYMPTOM of our dispossession is violent crime, which blights the lives of innocent White Americans every day. One of the most important studies ever published on this subject, “Racial Violence in America,” by writer and researcher Jerry Abbott, is available on the National Vanguard Web site. Much of what I’ll be talking about today is taken from that excellent essay, which includes incontrovertible mathematical and statistical proof that violent crime bears a close, nearly direct, relationship to the presence of Blacks and Mestizos in our midst.

Huge areas of our once-beautiful cities have become “no go” areas for Whites. In some of the worst places, utility companies seldom make repairs and even the police and the postal service fear to tread. In some areas, non-White gangs are literally in charge. White parents can no longer let their children roam free, from neighborhood to neighborhood, as they did when I was young: A White child’s life now consists of transportation from one controlled (and, one hopes, safe) venue to another for a succession of pre-planned activities. America has changed, and not for the better.

Let’s take a look at the statistics compiled by US law enforcement agencies on violent crime:

The average Black commits murder 7.9 times as often as the average White.

The average Black commits rape 4.4 times as often as the average White. If all rapes were reported, the Black to White ratio would be closer to 11.

The average Black commits armed robbery 9.6 times as often as the average White.

The average Black commits theft 17 times as often as the average White.

The average Black commits aggravated assault 3.9 times as often as the average White.

The average Black commits simple assault about 22 times as often as the average White.


Actually, the Black/White ratios for violent crimes are even higher than that, because the government falsely categorizes Mestizo criminals from Central America as White in these statistics. Middle Eastern offenders are also fraudulently categorized as White. (Interestingly, the government does not lump Mestizos in with Whites when publishing statistics on victims of crime.) When corrections are made for these statistical errors — or should I call them tricks? — we find that the average Black commits murder almost 9 times as often as the average White. One of the strengths of Jerry Abbott’s work is that he not only exposes such statistical sleight of hand — he corrects for it, so we can understand what’s really going on, something “our” government apparently doesn’t want us to do.

When it comes to interracial murders, the figures are even more shocking. From the study:

Quote:
The Justice Department uses its “White” category as a racial miscellaneous bin. . . The government can’t make Whites out of non-Whites by passing laws or making policies, any more than it can change the value of pi to 3.0000 for the convenience of engineers and architects. But they certainly have managed to impart confusion in the interpretation of their crime statistics — probably intentionally, don’t you think?

When you remove the non-Whites from the “White” offender totals, the per capita rate ratio of Black-on-White murders to White-on-Black murders becomes (typically) about 23. This ratio is a measure of the relative higher capacity of Blacks for racial hatred and of the relatively higher propensity of Blacks toward violence, as compared with Whites.

…Black and Mestizo gangs commit more murders in a single week, on the average, than all the organized White “racist” groups have even been accused of for the past 50 years. The government’s emphasis on so-called “hate crimes” (with a notable bias toward finding White people guilty of committing them) is the result of political pressure brought to bear on government agencies by the Jewish controlled media and by Jewish pressure groups, including the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith [ADL]. There is no genuine criminal justice need for the special category of “hate crime”; however, even if there were, the categorization is presently being abused with an anti-White bias.
And these facts are buttressed by other researchers. According to Frank Borzellieri in The Unspoken Truth, “Black-on-White robbery and rape are both 70 times more likely than the reverse; and Black-on-White gang violence is 83 times more likely.”

* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:51 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:51 AM   #214
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default ”Hate crimes” are an invented category of crime

”Hate crimes” are an invented category of crime, with no basis in reality. There were already laws in place, before the invention of the term “hate crime,” making robbery, assault, and murder illegal. Such crimes, among many others, may be turned into “hate crimes” based on a police officer’s or prosecutor’s opinion of what the perpetrator was thinking at — or before, even long before — the time the crime was committed.

For example, if you get in an altercation with a Black in a parking lot which leads to a charge of assault against you, you may face many times the normal fines and jail time of an ordinary assault charge if the “authorities” decide that you harbored hatred for Blacks in your heart prior to the fight. In other words, some politically correct bureaucrat’s opinion about your feelings will make all the difference in the world in the sentence you would receive if convicted. And, if you are discovered to have read politically incorrect books in the past or said something critical of Blacks on an online forum, that could well be the decisive factor in escalating your assault charge to a “hate crime” charge. It sure could boost the career of an inner-city cop or ambitious prosecutor to send a “racist” to jail, don’t you think? And what White man or White woman would want to speak out against non-White immigration or crime now that such statutes are on the books, knowing it might be used against him or her in court some day?

So it’s not surprising to discover that when Whites commit violence against Blacks, it’s termed a “hate crime” a greater percentage of the time than when Blacks commit violence against Whites. And it’s also not surprising to discover that the Jewish power structure was the number one force pushing for the adoption of “hate crime” laws, doubtlessly hoping to intimidate White Americans into silence on racial matters.

Nevertheless, Blacks commit such a disproportionate amount of violence against Whites that, even with such skewed application of the “hate crime” label, they still commit more than three times the number of such crimes than do Whites per capita — and four times the hate-motivated murder rate. This, despite the flagrantly obvious bias of the authorities when, again and again, they refuse to categorize attacks and killings of Whites by Blacks as “hate crimes,” despite explicit plans to harm Whites or the use of anti-White slurs during the crimes.

Unlike the unnecessary, fluid, and politicized category of “hate crimes,” there already long existed the real and undeniable category of interracial crimes — interracial assault, interracial murder, interracial rape, and all the rest. To categorize a crime as interracial one need not read minds to divine the feelings in a perpetrator’s heart. All that is necessary is that the victim and perpetrator be of different races. This is a much more difficult category to politicize. Statistics for interracial crime are much less likely to be fudged or faked than those for “hate crimes.” In the same year that Blacks were four times more likely to commit “hate crime” murder against Whites as the reverse, they were fourteen times as likely to commit interracial murder. That’s a big difference. Which statistic is based on hard facts, and which is based on politically-motivated fakery? The answer is obvious.

Back to the study:

Quote:
Thus, the political function of the “hate crime” category becomes evident — hate crime is an ill-defined category mainly used to trap Whites — which points toward the motive for creating that category of crimes…

As mentioned earlier, the FBI and DoJ usually lump Hispanics — most of whom are Mestizos — into their “White” racial category for the purpose of recording the race of crime perpetrators. However, on the relatively rare occasion when a violent White perpetrator chooses a victim whom he believes to be a[n] Hispanic… the FBI / DoJ pull out their “hate crime” score sheets and chalk up another non-White victim of a White “hate criminal.”
Let’s go over that again.

With Whites and Blacks, the law-enforcement policy regarding “hate crimes” seems to be one of “selective noticing.” As a rule (with exceptions) a “hate crime” is NOTICED when the perpetrator is White and the victim is Black. When the perpetrator is Black and the victim is White, no “hate crime” is noticed .

With Whites and Hispanics, the law-enforcement policy regarding “hate crimes” seems to involve a selective imputation of Mestizo [ancestry]. When the Mestizo is the perpetrator and the White is the victim, the FBI usually adopts the position that the Mestizo was White, too, so therefore the crime had no racial bias. But when the perpetrator is White and the victim is a Mestizo, the FBI does not perform its racial switcheroo on the Mestizo, and thus another “hate crime” by a “White racist” is recorded.

* * *

The mass media, which I have shown on this program to be dominated by the Jewish minority, purposely minimize the nature and extent of non-White crime.

This is true of news programs and newspapers, which systematically fail to report the races of victims — when they are White — and criminals — when they are non-White — except when to do so is absolutely unavoidable. These news outlets have a history, too, of very selective outrage: A non-White victim of Whites, like Rodney King or Trayvon Martin (never mind the fact that Zimmerman was only part White), is made into a national sensation, with flagship stories and headlines that run for months, burning unforgettable memories into the national consciousness. But when a crowd of 40 Blacks pulled a White man from a truck in Milwaukee, brutally beat him and then ran over him with his own truck, killing him, there was no outrage. When half a dozen Blacks in Jacksonville decided to attack the next White person they saw, then fell upon a mentally-disabled 50-year-old and beat him to death for the thrill of it, there was no media outrage and hardly any coverage. When similar attacks by Blacks on Whites occur all over the country under the name “The Knockout Game,” killing or maiming hundreds of Whites, many of them helpless and elderly, the controlled media utter hardly a peep.

And some of these controlled media outlets even admit that they are doing this. When a dozen Blacks gang-raped an 11-year-old in Houston recently, the Houston Chronicle studiously avoided mentioning the race of the attackers in its initial stories. Cindy Horswell, a senior writer for the paper, stated “We don’t ever include race normally — unless race is made an issue by other people.”

Tom Kent, the deputy managing editor for standards and production at the Associated Press, the wire service from which hundreds of newspapers across the country get their national news, said they have essentially the same policy: “We don’t identify people’s race in most stories, unless that is an issue.”

The Jewish-owned New York Times, no surprise, has a similar policy of concealing race in its stories: Philip Corbett, the Times associate managing editor for standards, says “We would mention race in a physical description only if it really is a detailed physical description that readers would learn something from. But if the description is a ‘white man in his 40s’ or ‘a black man in a hoodie,’ then you’re not really providing any useful information and it could be sort of boiler plate.”

And I’m not even mentioning the largely Jewish advertising agencies, whose portrayals of burglars in security system ads — or other criminals — almost always show White perpetrators, ostensibly to avoid hurting the sensitive feelings of non-Whites.

This is also true of so-called “reality” programs, like the long-running Cops series, which purports to show real-life stories of police officers on the dangerous streets of our cities. John Langley, the creator of the series, is a Gentile working in a very Jewish, very pro-multiracialist field. He’s a man who, to keep his high-paying job, always has to keep a moistened finger raised to sense which way the winds of political correctness are blowing. Recently a Black “civil rights” group tried to get his series canceled because, they claimed, it showed too many Black criminals. But Langley shot back, in an interview with Jewish journalist Ben Shapiro, saying that he purposely minimizes the number of non-White offenders shown on his show, and maximizes the number of White criminals shown, inverting reality so as not to, in his words, “contribute to negative stereotypes.” Langley said “I show more White people than statistically what the truth is in terms of street crime. If you look at the prisons, it’s 60-something per cent. people of color and 30-something per cent. of White people. If you look at Cops, it’s 60 per cent. White and 40 per cent. [people of color] — it’s just the reverse. And I do that intentionally, because I don’t want to contribute to negative stereotypes.”

So when you turn on your television or open your morning newspaper or read your “mainstream” news site, you’re getting a very sanitized vision of reality — a false image in which the real perpetrators of brutal violence against our people, the Blacks and Mestizos who are robbing and raping and murdering our children, our wives, our grandparents, our sons, and our daughters have been carefully edited out of the picture. They have been airbrushed out of the picture because showing us the truth might make us wake up to the dangers posed by living in a multiracial society — might make us question the idea of having open borders — might make us doubt the wisdom of sending our children into “integrated” schools — and just might make White people realize we have common interests and ought to stand together to protect them. And that the masters of the media cannot allow. It might just put an end to their agenda of White genocide — it might just put an end to their agenda of getting Black sperm to unite with White eggs — and, if we get angry enough, they fear, it might just put an end to them.

I urge each and every one of you who hears my words to read and share Racial Violence in America with your friends and family members. It’s irrefutable, insightful, and magnificently documented. It will convince even the most skeptical that we are being lied to about non-White crime in this country. It will awaken any mind that is still capable of independent thought. And, if what we say has changed your life and the lives of your loved ones for the better, we would deeply appreciate your support.

* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:51 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:56 AM   #215
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Toward a New Consciousness

American Dissident Voices: Toward a New Consciousness

Broadcast of March 1, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/03/...consciousness/


Dr. William Pierce, founder of both Cosmotheism
and the National Alliance.

Image source: Kevin Alfred Strom

A “TAX DODGE.” A “bogus religion.” Something he “abandoned” in later years in hopes of attracting Christians. So have William Pierce’s opponents, both within and without White nationalist circles, characterized Cosmotheism, the religion founded by Dr. Pierce.

But these characterizations are false. The Cosmotheist world view — the view that our race is the vanguard of the Universe’s evolving self-consciousness — was central to everything that Dr. Pierce wrote, uttered, and built during the last quarter century of his life.

The allegation that Dr. Pierce never believed in Cosmotheism and concocted it to get a tax exemption is so obviously preposterous that it really can’t be taken seriously. I’ll squash that idea with a heavy steel hammer in a future program. The most dangerous false claim about William Pierce and Cosmotheism, however, is more subtle and therefore harder to see, and it has even been embraced by some who claim to carry William Pierce’s banner: the idea that he essentially abandoned Cosmotheism — and his opposition to Christianity — in later years in order to make the National Alliance and his other efforts more “Christian-friendly” and to implement a “big tent” approach in which the National Alliance leadership cadre could include men and women whose morals and values were based on ancient Semitic scriptures.

This claim is not only false, but it is actually the reverse of the truth.

In its very early years, before Dr. Pierce’s world view was fully formed, the National Alliance and its newspaper Attack! were geared toward encouraging a racial-revolutionary attitude among White youth who opposed the degenerate Jewish-inspired “counterculture” of the early 1970s. Though the official founding of Cosmotheism was eight years in the future in 1970, during those eight years Dr. Pierce wrote article after article critical of the Christian churches and of Christianity generally. In those years and immediately afterward, in his Attack! and later National Vanguard newspapers he published such articles as: “The Role of the Church,” “Churches Bent on Suicide,” “Churches Misdirect Young Americans,” “A Rite of Summer,” and others with a decidedly critical attitude toward the Hebrew-derived faith.

Dr. Pierce’s seminal speech, Our Cause, written to explain the mission of the National Alliance in 1976 when the group was but six years old, is Cosmotheist both in its deepest meaning and in its tone, though written at a period during which Dr. Pierce still entertained the idea that “Jesus the Galilean” might have been a non-Jew fighting against the Jewish establishment of the time. One of the speech’s most inspiring passages is the following:

“Our purpose is the purpose for which the earth was born out of the gas and the dust of the cosmos, the purpose for which the first primitive amphibian crawled out of the sea three hundred million years ago and learned to live on the land, the purpose for which the first race of men held themselves apart from the races of sub-men around them and bred only with their own kind. It is the purpose for which men first captured lightning from the sky, tamed it, and called it fire; the purpose for which our ancestors built the world’s first astronomical observatory on a British plain more than 4,000 years ago. It is the purpose for which Jesus, the Galilean, fought the Jews and died 2,000 years ago; the purpose for which Rembrandt painted; the purpose for which Shakespeare wrote; and the purpose for which Newton pondered. Our purpose, the purpose with which we must become obsessed, is that for which the best, the noblest, men and women of our race down through the ages have struggled and died whether they were fully conscious of it or not. It is the purpose for which they sought beauty and created beauty; the purpose for which they studied the heavens and taught themselves Nature’s mysteries; the purpose for which they fought the degenerative, the regressive, and the evil forces all around them; the purpose for which, instead of taking the easy path in life, the downward path; they chose the upward path, regardless of the pain, suffering, and sacrifice that this choice entailed.”

Some sixteen years later, around 1992, Dr. Pierce’s views had evolved to the point that he was embarrassed by the “Jesus, the Galilean” phrase, as he told the Alliance’s Membership Coordinator (and current Director) Will Williams.

Williams writes: “Our Cause is an important speech, given in 1976. I was inspired by it as [many] are today, but not because Dr. Pierce mentioned Jesus as he did, in passing. Look at that sentence in its context, and remember that this was written by him [38] years ago. Soon after I went to work for Dr. Pierce in 1992, knowing how he felt about the adverse impact of Christianity on the race, I asked him specifically why he thought he had to add that, to me, repulsive sentence about the Galilean. I still remember exactly where we were standing at the time, and his defensive reaction: ‘Well, Goddamn, Will, what am I supposed to do now, do the speech over and leave that sentence out?’ There were too many audio tapes in circulation by then to redo Our Cause and leave that part out. Believe me, he wished he hadn’t put that reference to Jesus in that speech.”

But we don’t have to fast forward 16 years to see Dr. Pierce abandoning any hint or hope that Christianity or the figure of Jesus could be of any help in advancing the racial cause. By 1977, it could be fairly said that Cosmotheist ideas were foremost in Dr. Pierce’s mind. In that year he recorded two important speeches with an explicitly Cosmotheist basis, originally delivered at National Alliance meetings at the Alliance’s National Office in Arlington, Virginia: Human Dignity: A Racial Ethic and Cosmotheism: Wave of the Future. In the early 1980s I restored and edited those recordings for publication in the National Vanguard Books catalogue. What wasn’t included on the copies that were sold, though, were the openings of the meetings, which included the Cosmotheist affirmation, read out loud by all in attendance. Here is that affirmation:

“There is but one reality. That reality is the Whole. It is the Creator, the self-created. I am of the Whole. I am of the Creator, of the self-created. My purpose is the Creator’s purpose. My path is the path of the Creator’s self-realization. My path is the path of divine consciousness. My destiny is godhood.”

Also in 1977, Dr. Pierce published “Conservatism or Radicalism,” which I included in the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard (1984), in which he speaks of the spiritual foundations of the National Alliance: “Our dream is a progressive dream, a dream of unlimited progress over the centuries and the millennia and the eons which lie ahead of us. It is no conservative dream of peace, no sheeplike dream of ease and consumption and safety, but a dream of the achievement of our Destiny, which is Godhood. It is the only dream fitting for men and women of our race; it is the spirit of the Creator, it is the Universal Urge within us, expressing itself through our race-soul….

“We don’t hope to make revolutionary idealists out of the egoistic and materialistic masses, but we do hope to awaken and inspire and recruit that minority of our people in which the Divine Spark already burns brightly enough to illuminate their souls and their minds so that they can grasp our Truth. And the way to do that is to present our Truth to them as purely and as plainly and as clearly as we possibly can—not to dress it in a conservative disguise, which leads only to confusion.

“We want everyone to know that we understand that what’s really important is not whether we can elect a government which won’t try to impose racial quotas on us or whether we can achieve domestic tranquility but whether the Truth that is in the race-soul of our people shall overcome the alien falsehoods which rule us now, so that that Truth can guide us once again to the upward Path, to the Path of the Creator’s Self-Realization, and so that we can once again become agents of the Universal Will—except this time fully conscious agents—and resume our never-ending ascent toward our ordained Destiny.”

That, according to William Pierce, is the fundamental basis of the National Alliance. That’s not a philosophy or a strategy at all compatible with traditional Christianity or the more recent “Christian Identity” variant which retains the Hebrew scriptures but posits that White people are the “true Israelites.”

In 1978, Dr. Pierce published “What Is to be Done?”, also available in The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, in which he delineates the organizational structure necessary for our dream to become real: “[W]hat is to be done to save our race, in spite of itself?

“…The answer, in brief, is that an organization must be built which satisfies the following requirements:

“It must be, first of all, not an ad hoc organization, but an organization based on fundamental principles, an organization with a world view, essentially religious in nature, shared by every member of the organization.

“It must be, in structure, a hierarchical organization, like an army — or a religious order — with the degree of understanding, of commitment, and of discipline increasing with the level of responsibility in the organization.

“It must be, in scope, an all-encompassing organization, an organization which not only generates propaganda and which recruits and trains new members, but which becomes eventually a community unto itself, self-sufficient spiritually and materially, providing all the functions and capabilities needed for carrying out its task — ultimately a separate state within the state.”

A state within a state, a new society, led by an elite imbued with an essentially religious mission — a Cosmotheist mission — which defines not only the purpose of its members’ lives, but the purpose of Life itself in the Universe: This is Dr. Pierce’s vision of a White future. Those who reject it place themselves outside of the Alliance. Those who suggest a “National Alliance” in which Identity adherents and zealots who base their values on Semitic scriptures can be leading figures have placed themselves outside of the National Alliance — whether they know it or not.

In the same year, William Pierce penned “The Faustian Spirit,” in which he warns that our race must not “become a race solely of lawyers, clerks, laborers and merchants, but remain a race also of philosophers, poets, and inventors: of seekers of ultimate knowledge, of strivers toward the perfection which is Godhood. When we take the longest viewpoint, we can see that the Faustian spirit, tenuous though it may be, is European man’s entire justification for existence.” The idea expressed here by Dr. Pierce is fundamentally at odds with Christian doctrine.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:58 AM   #216
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Toward a New Consciousness:“Criteria for a White Future”

In “Criteria for a White Future,” he explains that the members of the organization that will save our race will necessarily have undergone an all-encompassing “spiritual renewal” which will revolutionize their values at the most fundamental level. Does that sound like it is compatible with Presbyterianism or “British Israel” or Sunday school homilies? I don’t think so.

In 1980′s “Why the West Will Go Under,” Dr. Pierce discusses the human qualities worthy of survival, the same qualities we should seek in building National Alliance cadres: “The[se people] must be free of the superstitions and prejudices of this age; those who are mentally bound to this age will go down with it…. They must be motivated by a single purpose, the overwhelming importance of which is always foremost in their minds; it has been the purposelessness of this age on which the West has foundered, but the new age will be illuminated and shaped by a common purpose transcending all other considerations: namely, the purpose of bringing forth a higher type of man and attaining thereby a higher level of consciousness in the universe.”

One of the most important statements William Pierce made on the subject was 1982′s “On Christianity,” published in the National Alliance Bulletin and now available on nationalvanguard.org, in which he says “No honest, conscientious Alliance member can maintain his membership in the Alliance and also in an organization which is fundamentally opposed to the goals and principles of the Alliance. The former member who belongs to the Moral Majority acted correctly in resigning from the Alliance, and the same applies to others: Any Alliance member who is also a member of a church or other Christian organization which supports racial mixing or Zionism should decide now where he stands, and he should then resign either from his church or from the Alliance.

“In fact, the great majority of Alliance members who originally had some Christian church affiliation have already made their decisions and left the churches….

“If, despite everything above, there are Alliance members or prospective Alliance members who still consider themselves Christians, then it must be in the sense that they value the specifically White elements of Christianity which have been added since its origins — the great art, the great music, and the great architecture produced by White men during the centuries in which the Christian churches ruled Europe — and that they also share the White spiritual feelings which have been eloquently expressed by many men and women who were Christians and who applied the adjective “Christian” to feelings which, in fact, came from deep within the White race-soul and existed long before the advent of the Christian church. Such Christians we can call our comrades and be proud to have in our ranks.”

So, when “big-tenters” say that Christians were accepted as members in Dr. Pierce’s National Alliance, they are technically correct — but there were strict restrictions, and spiritual evolution had to already be present to a large degree. And an evolution in spiritual values, an evolution beyond Christianity, was certainly expected of any who took a leading role.

Dr. Pierce’s 1997 radio essay, “On Churchgoers,” which on balance is deeply critical of Christianity, is sometimes quoted by “big tent” advocates because of one passage toward the end of the piece: “I say to all of my friends, to all self-respecting White men and women, Christian or not: Let’s not concern ourselves with doctrinal quibbles now. Let’s not concern ourselves with whether or not our neighbor believes in virgin birth and walking on water; let’s concern ourselves with whether or not he cares about the survival of his people and is willing to do something for that survival. If he or she does care, and if he or she is willing, then he is our brother, then she is our sister.”

Clearly, Dr. Pierce didn’t want conflict between the Alliance and racially conscious White Christians. We’re both on the same side in a titanic struggle for survival. Even in reaching out to these well-meaning folks, though, he urged them to place their scripture-based doctrines lower on their scale of values than their racial consciousness. But the “big tenters” want to use that paragraph to argue that believing Christians ought to be able to form part of the Alliance’s leadership cadre, something totally contrary to what Dr. Pierce said again and again.

It’s clear that Dr. Pierce’s views on spirituality evolved over time, but in quite the opposite direction claimed by the “big tent” folks. By the mid-1990s, the National Alliance had issued its Membership Handbook, which was still in force at the time of Dr. Pierce’s death in 2002. Its section on Christianity — which Dr. Pierce defined in its pages as an “opposing ideology” — is the strongest evidence imaginable showing that, in William Pierce’s view, the Middle Eastern faith was incompatible with the qualities sought in National Alliance leaders.

In the Handbook, he discusses Christianity as an asset of our race’s enemies: “Egalitarianism in turn gains support from Christianity, which declares all believers equal [as in the verses]: ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.’ (Galatians 3:28) By denigrating all worldly aspects of life, where natural inequality is so manifest, and emphasizing the otherworldly, which is less subject to scrutiny, Christianity has been able to maintain without revision much of the original egalitarianism which gave it a strong appeal to the slaves and other dispossessed groups in the decaying Roman Empire. Today Christianity provides a moral prop for those who want to justify the doctrine of human sameness.”

I’ll publish the entire National Alliance Membership Handbook section on Christianity as an appendix to the written version of this program. But let me illustrate its essence here with these passages: “The immediate and inevitable fact which forces us to come to grips with Christianity is that the mainstream Christian churches are all, without exception, preaching a doctrine of White racial extinction…. The occasional anomaly—a Catholic bishop in Poland speaking out angrily against Jewish arrogance, a few Protestant groups in the United States expressing sympathy for oppressed Palestinians—does not invalidate the rule.

“…We are obliged, therefore, to oppose the Christian churches and to speak out against their doctrines. But we do not, as some groups have done, accuse the Christian leaders of being false Christians. We do not say, ‘We are the real Christians, because we stand for the values which the mainstream churches stood for a century ago, before they were subverted.’ We do not reach for our Bibles and point to verses which seem to be in accord with the policies of the National Alliance and contrary to the present policies of the Christian churches. A diligent Bible scholar can find in the Judeo-Christian scriptures support for–or ammunition against–virtually any policy whatsoever.

“…Christianity, like the other Semitic religions, is irredeemably primitive. Its deity is thoroughly anthropomorphic, and its ‘miracles’—raising the dead, walking on water, curing the lame and the blind with a word and a touch—are the crassest superstition.

“We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul: it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress. Christianity, as the word is commonly understood, meets neither of these criteria.”

This, the most profound rejection of Christianity he ever published, came late in Dr. Pierce’s life and in the full maturity of his judgement. It was still being printed, still in full force and effect, when he died. Yet it was the first of his writings to be censored and excised from National Alliance publications by those who, by chance, bad fortune, and bad judgement, inherited the name — but not the essence — of the National Alliance.

[See here, Christianity, an ideology opposed to that of our Alliance's, from the National Alliance Membership Handbook, first edition, 1993: http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=515]

* * *
Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the new National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:52 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 02:33 AM   #217
whatduh
TAKE ONE FOR MARY
 
whatduh's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,784
whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!whatduh is a forum GOD!!
Points: 989,581,508, Level: 100
Points: 989,581,508, Level: 100 Points: 989,581,508, Level: 100 Points: 989,581,508, Level: 100
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Default

We are wire to be spiritual.

Science is just a subject because of it.
__________________
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

"Actually I believe people are the root of all evil and religion is simply a handy tool." Hayden
whatduh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 12:02 PM   #218
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Petty Nationalism and Religion

American Dissident Voices: Petty Nationalism and Religion
Broadcast of March 8, 2014
by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/03/...-and-religion/


The legend means “God is with us,” something
most every warring nation has said. What is the
difference between racial-nationalism and petty
nationalism? What role should religion play?


ONE LETTER-WRITER to American Dissident Voices objected to my article on US meddling in Ukraine, “The New Cold War,” calling it “an insult to true nationalists on the streets.” I suggested in my program that the Ukrainian patriots who’ve been tempted to ally themselves with the regime in Washington and the EU — or who acted in a way that advanced the EU/US agenda — would eventually come to deeply regret those decisions. I also stated that, despite my reservations about Putin and the new Russia, that nation has positioned itself in opposition to the world plantation being set up by the Jewish elite and its US military bully boys. I suggested that it is not in the interest of any White nation, Ukraine included, to support Washington’s side in this emerging conflict.

I understand that passions are running high in Ukraine right now. People are dying in the streets. Well-armed snipers funded by who knows who kill policemen and protesters alike. Armies are marching. And deep, deep historical wounds resulting from mass murder on a monumental scale cannot be ignored.

The letter-writer said that “nationalists should support nationalists.” To that I say “yes” but add that nationalists should, above all other things, be racial-nationalists — not petty nationalists, White peoples mired in disputes with neighboring White nations. Our enemies and competitors see us, Russians and Americans and Ukrainians and Frenchmen and all the rest, as one — as one to be slaughtered or defeated, that is. Unless we see ourselves as one, they are likely to succeed. Given the perilous position of our race today, the settling of historic “scores” between White nationalities should be low, vanishingly low, on our scale of values.

I see a strain of petty nationalism in Putin’s Russia, and I also see it in Svoboda and the Right Sector in Ukraine.

Russia refusing to recognize the horrors of the Holodomor — the mass starvation imposed by mostly-Jewish Bolsheviks on Ukrainians because they resisted Soviet Communism — is an example of petty nationalism. Just like ignorant Americans don’t dare doubt that World War 2 was a “good war,” with America on the side of the angels and the Axis powers on the side of “evil,” so also many ignorant Russians, even Russians who don’t support Communism, cannot abandon their “my country, right or wrong” mentality. These Russians can’t imagine World War 2 as anything except the “Great Patriotic War.” Just like unthinking Americans lap up the propaganda that the “War on Terror” is a righteous response by “our troops” to “Ay-rab terrorism” — ignoring the atrocities against innocents our soldiers are encouraged to commit and which drive so many of them to suicide, and ignoring the fact that this “War on Terror” is a creation of the Jewish neocons — so also many unthinking Russians want to sanitize their decades-long subservience to the architects of the intentional mass famines that killed millions.

But I also see some recognition of the real struggle for global White survival among leading elements in Russia — something that one cannot even imagine occurring in America or Western Europe today. Even before the fall of Communism, Leonid Brezhnev famously told Margaret Thatcher at an East-West summit in 1980 that their actions that day would determine the fate of our race, saying: “The only question is whether the White race will survive.” The only question!

More recently in 2008, Dmitry Rogozin, now Russia’s deputy prime minister and then ambassador to NATO, said: “There is an enormous distance between Europe and the Third World. There is a new civilization emerging in the Third World that thinks that the White, northern hemisphere has always oppressed it and must therefore fall at its feet now. This is very serious. If the northern civilization wants to protect itself, it must be united: America, the European Union, and Russia. If they are not together, they will be defeated one by one.” Rogozin sees America and the EU with rose-colored glasses, perhaps. But any leader’s concern for White civilization, or White anything, would result in instant political suicide in the West and not, I assure you, elevation to the position of deputy prime minister!

Just three weeks ago, a Russian MP from the ruling United Russia party spoke on the floor of the regional parliament in Kaliningrad, saying openly that Jews had ruined his country twice — in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and in the 1991 rape of the Russian economy by the Jewish oligarchs.

Clearly, as far as awareness of our plight and freedom of speech go, things are very different in Russia — and in Ukraine and in Eastern Europe generally — than they are in occupied America, very different indeed.

In Ukraine, I see real racial-nationalism in some of the statements of the nationalist parties. I see recognition of the dominant Jewish role in the mass murders that decimated their people. I see some clear proclamations that membership in a nation is defined by blood, not geography or language. That’s healthy. That’s realistic. That gives me hope that out of the current chaos might come someday a real racial-national revolution there. But some of these nationalists are far more focused on cutting Ukraine’s ties with Russia than they are with anything else. I see some of them explicitly calling for integration into the “West” via the European Union — and even cooperation with NATO. I see such short-sighted strategies as petty-nationalist in the extreme.

What everyone involved, whatever his nationality, needs to know is this: The regime in Washington is now an instrumentality of the Jewish power structure. That power structure has declared war on our race. Washington exercises its influence around the globe to squash all national resistance to the hegemony of Israel and of Jewish finance. In the service of that power structure, Washington’s policies are geared to exterminating its own founding race, limiting its births, transferring its wealth, and replacing it with cheap alien labor from the Third World. Whatever weakens that power structure is good for our race — and whatever strengthens that power structure also strengthens its ability to commit genocide against us.

Furthermore, the corrupt regime in Washington has an established pattern of betraying its allies whenever it is expedient to do so. In the 1980s both Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were lauded by Washington and supplied with millions in arms and aid. A few decades later, the Washington regime arranged to have these former allies hunted down and killed. In 2009, Obama shook Muammar Qadaffi’s hand and praised his reforms — just two years before facilitating his gruesome murder.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 12:03 PM   #219
Paul Parnitzke
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,063
Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!Paul Parnitzke is a forum GOD!!
Points: 85, Level: 1
Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1 Points: 85, Level: 1
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Default Settle your differences as brothers

So, to my Ukrainian friends and my Russian friends: Settle your differences as brothers, not enemies. Above all, do not trust the unspeakable monster in Washington. Whatever it says, whatever it promises, do not trust it. You may pay with your lives and the lives of your loved ones if you do. America is no longer a bulwark of freedom and anti-Communism. Whatever America seemed to be 60 years ago, it is not today. It is the opposite today. Whenever you have the chance to influence events, shift our world’s balance of power eastward, away from Washington, away from Brussels. Eastward, where our people — corrupt and imperfect and petty-nationalist as they may be — still rule themselves.

* * *

Another letter-writer told me: “Mr. Strom, you seem very anti-Christian… I happen to be a White Nationalist. And a Catholic. …[W]hat about Christians who are White Nationalists? …I’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices since I was 13. I’ve considered people like you, David Duke and the dearly departed William Pierce as teachers. …I am very aware of what …is happening to our people. I try not to get into frivolous debates about what religion is right for the White race…. I do however consider churches in general to be morally corrupted now. But Churches are an institution like schools. And like schools they have been corrupted by those who at this very moment are trying to ‘X’ us out of history. And erase us from this universe. The corruption in my opinion is reversible. I’ve met priests and ministers who are quite anti-Semitic. They were also highly against miscegenation. I remember talking to the father of my church a while back. And I asked him what he thought about miscegenation. And he told me that it was a sin against nature and God. …He also told me that it is hard to be a church leader with the ideas that he has. He said that the church had changed to such a point that he wished he [had been] born in any century that wasn’t the 20th century… Thank you Mr. Strom. And keep fighting the good fight.”

To that I reply: I salute your priest for his courage and intelligence and racial loyalty.

The three major problems with the creed he serves, though, are these: 1) it does not explicitly state the racial principles he so nobly expressed — they are, if anything, denied by his creed; 2) Christianity is not our creed — its origin is almost entirely Semitic, and it preaches universalism, the idea that there is one salvation and one universal morality for all races, and that who we really are is not defined by biology and evolution and genetics, but by whether or not we believe in a cobbled-together collection of primitive Hebrew holy books, whose content is provably untrue and preposterously ahistorical and anti-scientific on so many points it would take a hundred of these radio programs just to point them out.

Your priest is a courageous and honorable man, and I salute him. But his truthfulness and his righteousness are in spite of his creed, not because of it.

That makes him all the more courageous, I admit. But our people need more than just a few rebel priests and ministers. We need a whole new society, constructed from its very foundations, including its religious and moral foundations, for the purpose of preserving and advancing the life of our race.

I consider myself to be your kinsman and ally, regardless of differences in religious beliefs or practices. But I will continue to help my people see that they need a new belief system, one which puts racial survival and upward evolution first in our scale of values, and one based upon the scientifically ascertained realities of our universe, discovered by the questing minds of European man over the centuries, which prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Semitic scriptures are both alien and false.

* * *

Here comes the heavy steel hammer. I said I’d use it last week to debunk the notion — repeated on some supposedly pro-White forums but having its origin in an article published by a Jewish-operated smear sheet — that Dr. William Pierce created his religion, Cosmotheism, as a “tax dodge” and did not take its tenets seriously.

I worked with William Pierce for twenty years. For most of those years, I had almost daily conversations with him. His spiritual ideas, which he expressed in Cosmotheism, were the most important motivation for everything he did during the last quarter century of his life.

When I first discovered Dr. Pierce and the National Alliance in 1982, one of the very first things he asked me to do was to take home several cassette recordings of speeches he had made in the 1976-1977 time frame and listen to them carefully, which I did. Most of those recordings had Cosmotheist themes and began with the Cosmotheist affirmation. The very next year, 1983, Dr. Pierce published the first Cosmotheist booklet, The Path.

When Dr. Pierce started building his community on the hill in the Appalachian mountains of West Virginia, he invited the editor of the local newspaper to come visit him and see for himself what his efforts were all about. I was there. As I wrote in “I Remember Dr. Pierce“:

“One reason Dr. Pierce was glad we were there was his wish that we would constitute an audience for a discussion of Cosmotheism he had scheduled for the benefit of the editor of the local paper, the Pocahontas Times. The editor, a man named William McNeel, had heard the media claims that Cosmotheism was nothing but a ‘tax dodge’ and wanted to see for himself. Dr. Pierce, McNeel, a guest brought by McNeel, my wife, and I sat in the gathering twilight on folding chairs in the dusty, unfinished upper floor of the new office building and listened to recorded excerpts from Bernard Shaw’s Man and Superman, after which Dr. Pierce told the story of how the play, along with Nietzsche’s philosophy, had influenced the development of his religion. I think McNeel was expecting a somewhat slicker than average bigoted bumpkin with overtones of con man and Imperial Lizard. What he got was closer to a living Pythagoras.”

Dr. Robert S. Griffin spent many weeks with William Pierce, trying as best he could to understand his ideas and motivations, as he was writing his 2001 biography The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds. Dr. Pierce particularly directed Dr. Griffin’s attention to Shaw’s play and to his own Cosmotheist works. In fact, Dr. Pierce even stated that the proto-Cosmotheist ideas in Man and Superman influenced him as early as 1955 — long before his association with George Lincoln Rockwell and radical racial politics.

He told Griffin: “One of the things that helped me find direction was a play that I first came upon at Caltech back in 1955 or so–Man and Superman. Act three of the play was the one that really struck me. It expressed the idea that man shouldn’t hold himself back. He should completely use himself up in service to the Life Force. I bought a set of phonograph records that just had that act in it. As I remember, it had Charles Laughton, Charles Boyer, Agnes Moorehead, and Cedric Hardwicke–it was well done. Don Juan’s expositions were what resonated with me. I listened to that set of records over and over and let it really sink in. The idea of an evolutionary universe hit me as being true, with an evolution toward higher and higher states of self-consciousness, and the philosopher’s brain being the most highly developed tool for the cosmos coming to know itself. I felt I understood what Shaw meant. Over time, I have elaborated upon this idea–I came to call it Cosmotheism–and discussed it in a series of talks I gave in the 1970s.”

As I wrote last week, Dr. Pierce’s writings from the 1970s onward are filled with references to, as he saw it, the absolute necessity for a new spirituality among the leaders of our people. These same religious and philosophical ideals are integral to the National Alliance Membership Handbook, which he wrote in the 1990s. And William Pierce doubtlessly sacrificed financial support he would otherwise have received by remaining steadfast to these religious ideals.

Another man who worked closely with William Pierce for decades is the writer James Harting, who said “Cosmotheism is what William Pierce believed in, deep in his heart and deep in his mind. It was in no sense a tax dodge or a fantasy–it was William Pierce’s perception of the ultimate reality of the Universe.”

A few days before his death, when he knew his life was nearing its end, I and others were present at the hospital when Dr. Pierce remarked that he hadn’t had enough time to “do what needs to be done.” And he defined “what needs to be done” as building an organization “more like a holy order than a political group” with the purpose of that organization being the “bringing forth of a higher type of man” on this planet.
* * *

Disclaimer: Buyer Beware!
See:
http://forums.liveleak.com/showpost....&postcount=233

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the new National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

Last edited by Paul Parnitzke; 01-16-2018 at 03:53 PM.
Paul Parnitzke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2014, 04:48 PM   #220
snipershot
LiveLeaker
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 5,807
snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!snipershot is a forum GOD!!
Points: 675,981,438, Level: 100
Points: 675,981,438, Level: 100 Points: 675,981,438, Level: 100 Points: 675,981,438, Level: 100
Activity: 14%
Activity: 14% Activity: 14% Activity: 14%
Default

You do realise that we at LL are not interested in copy paste spam. What do YOU think.
__________________
evil triumphs when good men do nothing~
snipershot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 AM.